Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Occup Environ Med. 2010 Oct 25;68(4):250–256. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.056077

Table 4.

Associations between urine cadmium and selected kidney outcomes in models stratified by eGFR tertile (n = 712)a

eGFR < 88.9 ml/min/1.73 m2
(n=228)
eGFR 88.9-102.9 ml/min/1.73 m2
(n=240)
eGFR ≥ 103.0 ml/min/1.73 m2
(n=234)
Kidney Function Measure β coeff (95 % CI) Model r2 β coeff (95 % CI) Model r2 β coeff (95 % CI) Model r2
Est. Glomerular Filtration Rate, ml/min/1.73 m2
Ln-Urine Cadmium μg/L 3.1 (0.7, 5.4)* 0.26 0.92 (−0.5, 2.3) 0.10 6.5 (1.7, 11.3)** 0.13
Ln-Urine Creatinine, mg/dl −3.2 (−5.8, −0.7)* −0.6 (−2.1, 0.9) −4.9 (−10.4, 0.7)
Ln-NAG, μmol/h/g creatinine
Ln-Urine Cadmium μg/L 0.22 (0.06, 0.39)** 0.32 0.18 (−0.02, 0.38) 0.23 0.34 (0.17, 0.51)# 0.28
Ln-Urine Creatinine, mg/dl −0.25 (−0.43, −0.07)** −0.26 (−0.47, −0.05)* −0.43 (−0.62, −0.23)#
a

Models also adjusted for age, gender, BMI, ln-urine creatinine, work status (current vs. former lead worker), smoking dose [cigarettes per day × years of smoking) in quartiles for current smokers and ex-smoker status, diastolic blood pressure; alcohol consumption (never, former, current); education (< middle school graduate, < high school graduate, high school graduate, > high school) and annual income (≤ 10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, and > 40 million won), enrollee status (phase I vs. II study entry), and blood and tibia lead.

*

p-value < 0.05

**

p-value < 0.01

#

p-value < 0.001