Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 23;43(3):121–135. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00209.2010

Table 2.

Hepatic fatty acid content (mol %) for controls and LCNs fed each of the experimental diets

Fatty Acid Genotype Lard mol% (SE) Canola mol% (SE) Fish/Fungal mol% (SE) FA Class Significance, P
C14:0 Ctrl 0.7 (0.0) 0.6 (0.1) 0.5 (0.0)
LCN 0.6 (0.0) 0.6 (0.0) 0.5 (0.1)
C16:0 Ctrl 21.5 (0.3) 21.9 (0.9) 26.4 (0.4)
LCN 19.0 (0.5) 18.5 (0.7) 21.1 (0.5)
C18:0 Ctrl 5.8 (1.2) 5.6 (0.6) 12.8 (0.8)
LCN 4.8 (0.2) 4.4 (0.3) 7.3 (0.4)
C20:0 Ctrl 0.3 (0.0) 0.2 (0.0) 0.3 (0.1)
LCN 0.5 (0.1) 0.4 (0.0) 0.4 (0.1)
C22:0 Ctrl 0.1 (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 0.2 (0.1)
LCN 0.2 (0.0) 0.1 (0.0) 0.2 (0.1)
Σ SFA Ctrl 28.7 (1.5) 28.4 (1.0) 40.4 (1.1) Diet <0.0001
LCN 25.2 (0.6) 24.0 (0.8) 29.7 (0.8) Geno <0.0001
D*G 0.0006
C16:1 Ctrl 8.3 (1.0) 7.1 (0.7) 3.0 (0.5)
LCN 9.3 (0.3) 8.3 (0.6) 4.4 (0.5)
C18:1 Ctrl 44.2 (2.8) 39.7 (2.1) 14.2 (1.5)
LCN 47.4 (0.9) 46.4 (1.0) 25.1 (2.0)
C20:1 Ctrl 1.9 (0.3) 1.2 (0.2) 0.0 (0.0)
LCN 2.9 (0.2) 2.1 (0.1) 0.7 (0.1)
C22:1 Ctrl 0.2 (0.1) 1.5 (0.1) 0.4 (0.2)
LCN 0.5 (0.1) 0.2 (0.0) 0.2 (0.1)
Σ MUFA Ctrl 54.6 (4.1) 48.2 (3.0) 17.7 (2.0) Diet <0.0001
LCN 60.0 (1.0) 57.2 (1.4) 30.5 (2.5) Geno <0.0001
D*G NS
C18:2ω3 Ctrl 7.4 (1.0) 10.6 (1.0) 5.6 (0.6)
LCN 8.3 (0.3) 11.0 (0.7) 6.4 (0.5)
C18:3ω6 Ctrl 0.1 (0.0) 1.3 (0.3) 0.1 (0.0)
LCN 0.1 (0.1) 1.9 (0.2) 0.8 (0.1)
C20:3ω9 Ctrl 1.1 (0.3) 0.7 (0.2) 0.8 (0.2)
LCN 1.0 (0.1) 0.7 (0.1) 1.4 (0.1)
Σ PUFA Ctrl 7.5 (1.0) 11.9 (1.2) 5.7 (0.6) Diet <0.0001
LCN 8.4 (0.3) 12.7 (0.9) 7.2 (0.5) Geno NS
D*G NS
C20:4ω6 Ctrl 6.0 (1.4) 4.5 (0.8) 19.6 (0.8)
LCN 3.4 (0.1) 2.4 (0.2) 15.4 (0.5)
C20:5ω3 Ctrl 0.0 (0.0) 0.8 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1)
LCN 0.0 (0.0) 0.5 (0.0) 1.4 (0.1)
C22:6ω3 Ctrl 2.0 (0.4) 5.5 (1.0) 15.0 (1.0)
LCN 1.7 (0.1) 2.2 (0.5) 14.2 (1.9)
Σ HUFA Ctrl 8.0 (1.8) 10.7 (1.9) 35.4 (1.2) Diet <0.0001
LCN 5.1 (0.2) 5.0 (0.7) 31.1 (2.1) Geno 0.0009
D*G NS

The percentage of the fatty acids in each class (SFA, MUFA, PUFA, HUFA) is noted. Data shown are means (± SE) of 6–7 animals per group. Significance of difference was evaluated by 2-way ANOVA; significance values are as indicated.