Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2011 Jan 18;56(2):465–468. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.014

Table 1.

Project TwEATs SMS details by participant (168 total SMS)

Participant Provider % Missed

SMSa
% Problem

datab
Average

daily responsesc
Complianced Responses received
% within

15-min.c
% within

30-min.c
1 A 2.4 0.6 13.4 74.4 78.4 89.6
2 A 1.8 0.6 11.6 70.6 76.6 88.2
3 A 7.1 0.6 11.7 71.3 89.7 97.1
4 A 2.4 0.6 11.7 70.8 68.9 82.5
5 A 7.1 0.0 14.9 84.3 89.1 97.9
6 A 6.5 1.2 15.9 96.0 89.3 97.4
7 A 2.4 0.0 5.1 37.7 57.1 78.6
8 A 3.6 1.2 13.9 86.6 85.5 98.8
9 A 7.1 0.6 10.7 70.4 92.4 96.4
10 B 0.6 0.6 15.7 90.3 98.2 99.1
11 B 2.4 0.0 6.7 47.7 93.5 94.5
12 B 1.2 0.0 12.3 81.0 83.3 91.7
13 C 0.6 3.0 16.4 87.9 79.9 97.0
14 C 0.6 3.0 15.5 88.2 65.5 86.9
15 C 1.2 3.6 10.7 60.7 84.3 93.5

Mean±SD 3.1±2.6 1.0±1.1 12.4±3.2 74.5±16.2 82.1±11.3 92.6±6.3
a

Missed SMS were not sent to participants due to mobile service complications (total number for seven-day period).

b

Problem data were SMS responses were received within 10-minutes of each other or were multiples of ratings received in the same hour.

c

Not including problem data.

d

Compliance was defined as the percentage of SMS responses received during waking hours per individual and counts missed SMS towards non-compliance.