Table 2.
Ascertainment | Control | Method | Sibship | Nuclear | Moderate Pedigree | Extended Pedigree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Random | Familial | VC | 0.052 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.049 |
Naïve | 0.053 | 0.049 | 0.048 | 0.050 | ||
Weight | 0.035 | 0.024 | 0.031 | 0.028 | ||
MQLS | 0.052 | 0.050 | 0.048 | 0.052 | ||
Independent | VC | 0.051 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.049 | |
Naïve | 0.066 | 0.066 | 0.059 | 0.078 | ||
Weight | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.048 | 0.060 | ||
MQLS | 0.053 | 0.040 | 0.046 | 0.045 | ||
| ||||||
Selective | Familial | VC | 0.058 | 0.052 | 0.051 | 0.055 |
Naïve | 0.016 | 0.024 | 0.039 | 0.054 | ||
Weight | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.024 | ||
MQLS | 0.058 | 0.050 | 0.046 | 0.048 | ||
Independent | VC | 0.050 | 0.055 | 0.057 | 0.048 | |
Naïve | 0.084 | 0.100 | 0.103 | 0.092 | ||
Weight | 0.057 | 0.059 | 0.062 | 0.064 | ||
MQLS | 0.051 | 0.048 | 0.047 | 0.050 |
Note: For 5000 simulations and considering a multiple testing correction to correct for the 16 scenarios, the 95% confidence interval for a type 1 error of 0.05 is (0.041 to 0.060). Bold values represent significantly inflated from a type 1 error of 0.05 (anti-conservative) and underlined values significantly reduced type 1 error of 0.05 (conservative). VC, variance correction.