Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):830–831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.830

Table.

Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, ovarian, colorectal, and lung cancer. Values are numbers (percentages)

Deprivation group*
Total
Affluent Middle Deprived
Breast cancer n=548 n=1605 n=364 n=2517
Tumour size (mm):
 0-20 271 (49.5) 730 (45.5) 166 (45.6) 1167 (46.4)
 21-50 124 (22.6) 409 (25.5) 109 (29.9) 642 (25.5)
 >50 14 (2.6) 49 (3.1) 13 (3.6) 76 (3.0)
 Unknown 139 (25.4) 417 (26.0)  76 (20.9) 632 (25.1)
Significance χ2=9.89, df=6, P=0.13
Node status:
 Positive 144 (26.3) 467 (29.1) 111 (30.5) 722 (28.7)
 Inadequate negative sample  58 (10.6) 178 (11.1) 31 (8.5) 267 (10.6)
 Negative§ 208 (38.0) 523 (32.6) 128 (35.2) 859 (34.1)
 Unknown 138 (25.2) 437 (27.2)  94 (25.8) 669 (26.6)
Significance χ2=7.79, df=6, P=0.25
Metastatic status at presentation
 M0 517 (94.3) 1492 (93.0) 331 (90.9) 2340 (93.0)
 M1 31 (5.7) 113 (7.0) 33 (9.1) 177 (7.0)
Significance χ2=3.89, df=2, P=0.14
Colorectal cancer n=590 n=1734 n=453 n=2777
Dukes' stage:
 A  61 (10.3) 149 (8.6 ) 38 (8.4) 248 (8.9)
 B 202 (34.2) 576 (33.2) 156 (34.4) 934 (33.6)
 C 130 (22.0) 415 (23.9)  97 (21.4) 642 (23.1)
 ‘D’ 117 (19.8) 377 (21.7) 101 (22.3) 595 (21.4)
 Unknown  80 (13.6) 217 (12.5)  61 (13.5) 358 (12.9)
Significance χ2=4.74, df=8, P=0.79
Ovarian cancer n=304 n=856 n=226 n=1386
Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique stage:
 I  73 (24.0) 191 (22.3)  33 (14.6) 297 (21.4)
 II 30 (9.9) 77 (9.0) 14 (6.2) 121 (8.7)
 III 126 (41.4) 388 (45.3) 108 (47.8) 622 (44.9)
 IV  51 (16.8) 131 (15.3)  44 (19.5) 226 (16.3)
 Unknown 24 (7.9) 69 (8.1)  27 (11.9) 120 (8.7)
Significance χ2=14.96, df=8, P=0.06
Lung cancer n=534 n=2371 n=950 n=3855
Clinical stage:
 Localised 152 (28.5) 758 (32.0) 342 (36.0) 1252 (32.5)
 Regional 134 (25.1) 628 (26.5) 214 (22.5) 976 (25.3)
 Distant 183 (34.3) 726 (30.6) 295 (31.1) 1204 (31.2)
 Unknown  65 (12.2) 259 (10.9)  99 (10.4) 423 (11.0)
Significance χ2=13.52, df=6, P=0.04
*

Patients were assigned to a 1991 census derived Carstairs deprivation category based on their postcode sector of residence at diagnosis. Carstairs deprivation categories: 1 and 2, affluent; 3, 4, and 5, middle; 6 and 7, deprived. 

Deprivation score could not be assigned for one case. 

Represents 1, 2, 3, or unknown number of nodes sampled, all negative. 

§

Represents 4 or more nodes sampled or axillary clearance, all negative.