Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurogenet. 2010 Oct 4;24(4):234–245. doi: 10.3109/01677063.2010.519805

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Measurements of wing extension behavior. (A) No differences in courtship index (CI) were observed among genotypes (mean ± s.e.m.). (B) tshGAL4/UAS-tra flies had a significantly decreased median wing extension duration compared to tshGAL4/+ controls, while tshGAL4/UAS-fruMIR males were no different than controls. (C) Mean of a fly’s median wing extension duration. tshGAL4/UAS-tra males display significantly shorter wing extensions than tshGAL4/+ controls. (D) Wing extension frequency, separating extensions shorter and longer than 0.5 s. tshGAL4/UAS-tra flies are not different in frequency of total wing extensions, but exhibit more frequent wing extensions shorter than 0.5 s and less frequent wing extensions longer than 0.5 s compared to tshGAL4/+ controls. There is no difference between tshGAL4/UAS-fruMIR males and tshGAL4/+ control males. Sample size indicated within bars in (D). *: p < 0.05.