Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2011 Mar;57(3):299–301.

Are probiotics safe for use during pregnancy and lactation?

Jackie Elias, Pina Bozzo, Adrienne Einarson
PMCID: PMC3056676  PMID: 21402964

Abstract

Question There has been a great deal of discussion in both the medical and lay literature about the use of probiotics to improve general health. Subsequently, pregnant women have been asking me if probiotics used for treating conditions such as bacterial vaginosis and diarrhea are safe to use during pregnancy and lactation.

Answer Current data suggest that probiotic supplementation is rarely systemically absorbed when used by healthy individuals. One meta-analysis and several randomized controlled trials conducted with women during the third trimester of pregnancy did not report an increase in adverse fetal outcomes. There have been no published studies addressing Saccharomyces species use in pregnancy. Probiotics are unlikely to be transferred into breast milk.


Probiotics are live microorganisms (in most cases bacteria) that are similar to beneficial microorganisms found naturally in the human gut. They are available to consumers mainly in the form of dietary supplements and foods, and “when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host.”1 The most widely used probiotics in Canada are live bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species and nonpathogenic yeast such as Saccharomyces. They are available alone or in combination as tablets, drops, liquids, and oral or vaginal capsules; they are also contained in various fermented foods, most commonly yogurt. Probiotics have been used for the treatment of acute diarrhea, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile, and yeast and bacterial vaginosis. In healthy humans, lactobacilli are normally present in the oral cavity, ileum, colon, and vagina.

Product safety

When ingested orally or used vaginally, probiotics are generally considered safe and are well tolerated. One theoretical concern associated with probiotics is the potential for these organisms to cause systemic infections. Although rare, probiotic-related bacteremia and fungemia have been reported.2 It is estimated that the risk of developing bacteremia from ingested Lactobacillus probiotics is less than 1 per 1 million users,3 and the risk of developing fungemia from Saccharomyces boulardii is estimated at 1 per 5.6 million users, and is estimated to be lower in healthy individuals.4 There have been no reports of bifidobacterium sepsis associated with the use of probiotics in healthy individuals.5 Risk factors for systemic infections include immunosuppression, critical illness, central venous catheters, and impairment of the intestinal epithelial barrier.3 Probiotics administered orally to combat urogenital infections are not systemically absorbed but rather get to the site of action by passage through the gastrointestinal system and ascending into the vagina.6

Use in pregnancy

Because the risk of probiotic-induced bacteremia and fungemia is low, probiotics are unlikely to reach the systemic circulation of the fetus, and therefore are unlikely to cause harm. A meta-analysis and systematic review of 8 randomized control trials of probiotic use in more than 1500 pregnant women was published.7 Most of the women began probiotic treatment between 32 and 36 weeks’ gestation and continued until delivery. The studies included in the meta-analysis compared Lactobacillus spp alone or in combination with Bifidobacterium spp with placebo. There was no increase in the incidence of miscarriages or malformations, which was expected because probiotic use mostly occurred in the third trimester and was therefore unlikely to affect organogenesis. There was no significant difference in birth weight, gestational age, or the incidence of cesarean section.

Several randomized control trials conducted in pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy were published following the meta-analysis (Table 1).815 These studies examined Lactobacillus spp and Bifidobacterium spp as monotherapy or in combination. Although not designed to directly evaluate pregnancy outcomes, these studies did not suggest an increase in adverse outcomes related to probiotics. Two observational studies examining the use of lactobacilli in the first trimester of pregnancy reported no increased risk of malformations.16,17

Table 1.

Randomized placebo-control trials of probiotics exposure during pregnancy

STUDY NO. OF PATIENTS PERIOD OF EXPOSURE PROBIOTICS PREGNANCY OUTCOMES COMMENTS
Boyle et al,8 2008 73 36 weeks’ gestation to delivery Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Not reported None
Kopp et al,9 2008 68 4–6 weeks before expected delivery to 6 months after delivery L rhamnosus GG No significant difference in gestational age, birth weight, or method of delivery Selected women with uneventful pregnancies and without underlying chronic disease (ie, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic infectious disease)
Kukkonen et al,10 2008 1223 4 weeks before expected delivery L rhamnosus GG and LC705; Bifidobacterium breve Bb99; and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp shermanii JS No significant difference in birth weight, birth length, and incidence of vaginal delivery Excluded birth at < 37 weeks’ gestation and infants born with major malformations. Babies also received treatment for 6 months after delivery
Huurre et al,11 2008 140 First trimester to end of exclusive breastfeeding L rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 No significant difference in gestational age or incidence of cesarean section Women with chronic or metabolic disease before or during early pregnancy were excluded
Kuitunen et al,12 2009 1223 36 weeks’ gestation to delivery L rhamnosus LC705, B breve Bb99, and P freudenreichii ssp shermanii JS No significant difference in birth weight Babies received treatment for 6 months after delivery
Niers et al,13 2009 156 6 weeks before expected delivery to delivery Bifidobacterium bifidum W23 and B lactis W52 No significant difference in the incidence of cesarean section, birth weight, or prematurity or gestational age Babies received treatment for 12 months after delivery
Allen et al,14 2010 454 36 weeks’ gestation to delivery Lactobacillus salivarius CUL61 and Lactobacillus paracasei CUL08 No significant difference in adverse events related to pregnancy or childbirth Babies received treatment for 6 months after delivery
Luoto et al,15 2010, 256 First trimester to end of exclusive breastfeeding L rhamnosus GG and B lactis Bb12 No significant differences in incidence of adverse outcomes; significantly lower birth weight (P = .035) and shorter birth length(P = .028) None

There are 2 published randomized control trials11,15 of women exposed to probiotics commencing in the first trimester until the end of exclusive breastfeeding (Table 1).815 Both studies examined the combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG and Bifidobacterium lactis compared with placebo. Neither study was specifically designed to examine pregnancy outcomes; therefore, malformations were not reported. Luoto et al15 found that infants born to women in the probiotics group had statistically significant lower risk of increased birth weight (P = .035) and birth length (P = .028); however, the clinical significance of this slight difference is unknown. This finding was not confirmed in the study by Huurre et al.11 Both studies demonstrated no significant difference in gestational age or the incidence of cesarean section. There have been no published studies addressing Saccharomyces spp as an intervention for pregnant women.

Use in breastfeeding

Because probiotics are rarely systemically absorbed, they are not expected to transfer into breast milk. One randomized control trial examined Lactobacillus reuteri levels in 174 colostrum samples after maternal and infant oral supplementation of this probiotic.18 Although higher in the active than in the placebo group, the prevalence of L reuteri in colostrum was low and not clinically important. Abrahamsson et al18 suggested that the most likely origin of L reuteri in colostrum was external contamination from the gastrointestinal tract. There are no published data regarding adverse effects in breastfed infants. In several of the studies previously mentioned,10,1214 infants received probiotic therapy after delivery without an increase in adverse effects.

Conclusion

Probiotics do not appear to pose any safety concerns for pregnant and lactating women. Systemic absorption is rare when probiotics are used by healthy individuals, and the current literature does not indicate an increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes.

MOTHERISK

Motherisk questions are prepared by the Motherisk Team at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ont. Ms Elias is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Toronto. At the time this paper was written, Ms Bozzo was a member and Ms Einarson was Assistant Director of the Motherisk Program. Ms Bozzo is now Assissant Director and Ms Einarson continues to be a member of the Motherisk Program.

Do you have questions about the effects of drugs, chemicals, radiation, or infections in women who are pregnant or breastfeeding? We invite you to submit them to the Motherisk Program by fax at 416 813-7562; they will be addressed in future Motherisk Updates.

Published Motherisk Updates are available on the Canadian Family Physician website (www.cfp.ca) and also on the Motherisk website (www.motherisk.org).

Footnotes

Competing interests

None declared

References

  • 1.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization . Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. London, ON: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization; 2002. Available from: www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf. Accessed 2010 Oct 28. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Snydman DR. The safety of probiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(Suppl 2):S104–11. doi: 10.1086/523331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Borriello SP, Hammes WP, Holzapfel W, Marteau P, Schrezenmeir J, Vaara M, et al. Safety of probiotics that contain lactobacilli or bifidobacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(6):775–80. doi: 10.1086/368080. Epub 2003 Mar 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karpa KD. Probiotics for Clostridium difficile diarrhea: putting it into perspective. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(7):1284–7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K228. Epub 2007 Jun 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boyle RJ, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML. Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6):1256–64. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reid G, Bruce AW, Fraser N, Heinemann C, Owen J, Henning B. Oral probiotics can resolve urogenital infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2001;30(1):49–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2001.tb01549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dugoua JJ, Machado M, Zhu X, Chen X, Koren G, Einarson TR. Probiotic safety in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces spp. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(6):542–52. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34218-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boyle RJ, Mah LJ, Chen A, Kivivuori S, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML. Effects of Lactobacillus GG treatment during pregnancy on the development of fetal antigen-specific immune responses. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(12):1882–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03100.x. Epub 2008 Sep 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kopp MV, Goldstein M, Dietschek A, Sofke J, Heinzmann A, Urbanek R. Lactobacillus GG has in vitro effects on enhanced interleukin-10 and interferon-gamma release of mononuclear cells but no in vivo effects in supplemented mothers and their neonates. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(4):602–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02911.x. Epub 2007 Dec 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kukkonen K, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, et al. Long-term safety and impact on infection rates of postnatal probiotic and prebiotic (synbiotic) treatment: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):8–12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huurre A, Laitinen K, Rautava S, Korkeamäki M, Isolauri E. Impact of maternal atopy and probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on infant sensitization: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(8):1342–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03008.x. Epub 2008 May 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuitunen M, Kukkonen K, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, Tuure T, et al. Probiotics prevent IgE-associated allergy until age 5 years in cesarean-delivered children but not in the total cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(2):335–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Jan 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Niers L, Martín R, Rijkers G, Sengers F, Timmerman H, van Uden N, et al. The effects of selected probiotic strains on the development of eczema (the PandA study) Allergy. 2009;64(9):1349–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02021.x. Epub 2009 Apr 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Allen SJ, Jordan S, Storey M, Thornton CA, Gravenor M, Garaiova I, et al. Dietary supplementation with lactobacilli and bifidobacteria is well tolerated and not associated with adverse events during late pregnancy and early infancy. J Nutr. 2010;140(3):483–8. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.117093. Epub 2010 Jan 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Luoto R, Laitinen K, Nermes M, Isolauri E. Impact of maternal probiotic-supplemented dietary counselling on pregnancy outcome and prenatal and postnatal growth: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Nutr. 2010;103(12):1792–9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993898. Epub 2010 Feb 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jick H, Holmes LB, Hunter JR, Madsen S, Stergachis A. First-trimester drug use and congenital disorders. JAMA. 1981;246(4):343–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aselton P, Jick H, Milunsky A, Hunter JR, Stergachis A. First-trimester drug use and congenital disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(4):451–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abrahamsson TR, Sinkiewicz G, Jakobsson T, Fredrikson M, Björkstén B. Probiotic lactobacilli in breast milk and infant stool in relation to oral intake during the first year of life. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(3):349–54. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31818f091b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES