Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 14;6(3):e17718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017718

Table 4. Results of power analysis for different CAG allele categories used in the logistic regression alongwith the input parameters.

Odds ratio Pr(Y = 1|X = 1) H0 α err prob (P-value) Total sample size Binomial distribution parameter π Power (1-β)
a CAG RN >19 1.56 0.34 0.05 682 0.44 0.878
a BAM≥21 2.42 0.34 0.05 341 0.18 0.997
b BAM≥21 2.04 0.24 0.05 297 0.15 0.679
c BAM≥21 3.14 0.16 0.05 268 0.16 0.916
a

Pooled RSA cases Vs Controls (For CAG RN, Cases: 2N = 234 Controls: 2N = 448; For BAM, Cases: N = 117 Controls: N = 224).

b

RSA (2abortions) Vs Controls (Cases: N = 73 Controls: N = 224).

c

RSA (≥3abortions) Vs Controls (Cases: N = 44 Controls: N = 224).