Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Place. 2010 Dec 14;17(2):438–448. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.002

Table 1.

Summary of the macro-area unita of analysis and type of segregation measured used in the published research, 1950-2009

Macro unit of analysis Segregation
dimension
# of
publications
# (%) of positive
association
MSA Formal:
 Evenness 13
 Exposure/isolation 6
 Concentration 1
 Clustering 2
 Centralization 1
 Hypersegregation 1
Total 24 21 (87.5%)
Proxy:
 Racial composition 3
Total 3 1 (50%)
State Formal:
 Evenness 1
 Exposure/isolation 1
 Concentration 1
Total 3 3 (100%)
Proxy:
 Racial composition 3
Total 3 1 (33%)
City Formal:
 Evenness 2
 Exposure / Isolation 4
 Wong’s local index 3
Total 9 8 (88.8%)
Proxy:
 Racial composition 5
Total 5 2 (40%)
County Formal
 Evenness 2
 Exposure/isolation 1
Total 3 1 (33.3%)
Proxy:
 Racial composition 2
Total 2 1 (50%)
Census tract Proxy:
 Racial composition 1
Total 1 1 (100%)
Individualb Proxy:
 Racial composition 3
Total 3 2 (66.6%)

Note: A single study may examine multiple segregation measures for a specific health outcome or multiple health outcomes for a specific measure of segregation. Therefore, some studies may be listed more than once or have two different associations for a single outcome.

Abbreviations: Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)

a

Some studies that used racial composition as a measure of segregation were not included in this table since a macro-area unit of analysis is not specified.

b

Creation of measure based on assessing racial/ethnic composition across various context over lifecourse.