Table 3.
Means and their standard deviations of sporulation of different isolates on genotypes and transgenic lines
| Genotypes | Race | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expression of inserted genea | EU-B05 | 1639 | US-3 | EU-D42 | EU-NL05 | NZ 188 | |
| ‘Gala’ | 0.00 | 2.87 ± 1.97 | 4.16 ± 2.02 | 4.00 ± 0.81 | 3.62 ± 1.75 | 3.16 ± 1.04 | 5.00 ± 0.40 |
| ‘Santana’ | 1.00 | 0.37 ± 0.25 | 0.16 ± 0.28 | 0.25 ± 0.50 | 3.37 ± 1.79 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 0.37 ± 0.47 |
| SPHcrVf1-12 | 2.4 | 3.50 ± 1.77 | 5.0 | 5.00 ± 0.57 | 2.87 ± 1.65 | 3.50 ± 0.40 | 4.87 ± 0.62 |
| LPHcrVf1-7 | 13 | 2.37 ± 0.85 | 4.16 ± 0.76 | 4.50 ± 0.70 | 2.87 ± 1.88 | 3.87 ± 0.85 | 5.25 ± 0.28 |
| PMdRbc HcrVf1-9 | 421 | 2.62 ± 0.85 | NA | 4.50 ± 1.22 | 2.62 ± 0.62 | 3.12 ± 0.94 | 4.00 ± 1.08 |
| SPHcrVf2-11 | 0.84 | 0.25 ± 0.28 | 1.00 ± 1.41 | 0.62 ± 0.94 | 3.62 ± 0.85 | 0.62 ± 0.25 | 0.75 ± 0.28 |
| LPHcrVf2-16 | 1.1 | 4.00 ± 1.22 | 4.30 ± 0.76 | 4.37 ± 1.31 | 3.62 ± 1.03 | 2.37 ± 0.47 | 3.62 ± 1.65 |
| PMdRbc HcrVf2-3 | 81 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.50 ± 0.91 | 0.62 ± 0.75 | 3.37 ± 1.97 | 0.62 ± 0.47 | 0.41 ± 0.58 |
| PMdRbc HcrVf2-12 | 163 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | n.d. | n.d. | 2.12 ± 1.03 | n.d. | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| LPHcrVf2-4 | 7.1 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 2.83 ± 1.60 | n.d. | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
Races are represented in horizontal direction, Genotypes are represented vertically, SP-Short Promoter, LP Long Promoter, PMdRbc-Apple rubisco gene promoter, ‘Santana’ resistant cultivar, ‘Gala’ susceptible cultivar, n.d. not determined, a data from Table 2; expression of inserted genes measured in relation to Santana which is considered as 1.00, Means represent average of two leaves of four plants (eight values), ± represents the standard deviation of the mean. Sporulation were scored based on scale as described by Durel et al. (2003) which is class 0, 0% sporulation, class 1, 1–2% sporulation, class 2, 2–5% sporulation, class 3, 5–10% sporulation, class 4, 10–25% sporulation, class 5, 25–50% sporulation, class 6, 50–75% sporulation, class 7, 75–100% sporulation