Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 12;55(3):856–867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.008

Table 2.

Comparison of performance of single-modal and multimodal classification methods. The numbers in each bracket denote the minimal and maximal classification rate in 10 independent experiments

Methods AD vs. HC
MCI vs. HC
ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%)
MRI 86.2
(82.9-89.0)
86
(82.7-88.7)
86.3
(83.1-89.1)
72.0
(68.4-74.7)
78.5
(75.6-80.6)
59.6
(55.1-63.7)
CSF 82.1
(80-84.9)
81.9
(80-84.7)
82.3
(80-85.1)
71.4
(68.2-73.3)
78
(75.6-79.4)
58.8
(54.3-61.7)
PET 86.5
(82.9-90.5)
86.3
(82.7-90.3)
86.6
(83.1-90.6)
71.6
(67.4-74.7)
78.2
(75-80.6)
59.3
(52.9-63.7)

Combined 93.2
(89.0-96.5)
93
(88.7-96.3)
93.3
(89.1-96.6)
76.4
(73.5-79.7)
81.8
(79.4-84.4)
66.0
(62.6-70.3)
Baseline 91.5
(88.5-96.5)
91.4
(88.3-96.3)
91.6
(88.6-96.6)
74.5
(71.9-78.2)
80.4
(78.3-83.3)
63.3
(59.7-68.3)

AD = Alzheimer’s Disease, MCI = Mild Cognitive Impairment, HC = healthy control, ACC = classification ACCuracy, SEN = SENsitivity, SPE = SPEcificity