Table 4.

Inter-rater reliability of the Memory for Intentions Screening Test (N = 67).

MIST variable	Rater 1	Rater 2	ICC *	95% CI	Agreement (%)
Summary	43.5 (39.0,48.0)	43.5 (39.0,48.0)	.99	.98, .99	88.1
Trial 1	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	.98	.97, .99	98.5
Trial 2	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	.92	.87, .95	98.5
Trial 3	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	1.00	1.0, 1.0	100.0
Trial 4	2.0 (1.0, 2.0)	2.0 (1.0, 2.0)	.95	.93, .97	97.0
Trial 5	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	.97	.95, .98	98.5
Trial 6	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	.89	.82, .93	95.5
Trial 7	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	2.0 (2.0, 2.0)	---	---	98.5
Trial 8	1.0 (1.0, 2.0)	1.0 (1.0, 2.0)	.99	0.99, 0.99	98.5
Total errors	1.0 (0.0, 2.0)	1.0 (0.0, 2.0)	.97	.95, .98	88.1
PM errors	0.0 (0.0, 0.0)	0.0 (0.0, 0.0)	1.0	1.0, 1.0	100.0
LC errors	0.0 (0.0, 1.0)	0.0 (0.0, 1.0)	.98	.96, .99	97.0
LT errors	0.0 (0.0, 1.0)	0.0 (0.0, 1.0)	.98	.96, .99	97.0
TS errors	0.0 (0.0, 0.8)	0.0 (0.0, 1.0)	.76	.64, .85	80.6

Note. Data are presented as medians with the interquartile ranges in parentheses. ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; CI = confidence interval for the ICCs; LC = loss of content; LT = loss of time; NR = no response; R = random; TS = task substitutions.

^*all ps < 0.0001.