Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1137–1146. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1137

Table 1.

Experiment 1a and Experiment 1b Noun 2 Summary

Experiment 1a Experiment 1b


Metric Non-repeated Repeated Non-repeated Repeated
M SE M SE M SE M SE
Duration (ms) 393 (13.8) 376 (14.3) 356 (10.3) 339 (10.7)
Proportion .424 (.008) .413 (.008) .420 (.007) .406 (.007)
Intensity (db) 78.7 (1.14) 78.6 (1.08) 77.6 (0.97) 77.0 (1.00)
Average F0 (Hz) 167 (9.02) 165 (9.14) 156 (8.94) 155 (8.19)
F0 Maximum (Hz) 196 (11.3) 194 (11.2) 179 (10.7) 181 (10.7)
F0 Minimum (Hz) 141 (8.07) 140 (8.23) 136 (7.36) 135 (7.19)

Values in parentheses represent standard errors of the means. Note: In Experiment 1a, repeated nouns have low predictability (6.25% of trials) while non-repeated nouns have high predictability (93.75% of trials). In Experiment 1b, repeated and non-repeated nouns are equally likely.