Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Comb Sci. 2011 Feb 21;13(2):159–165. doi: 10.1021/co1000508

Table 3.

SAR Evaluation of Sulfonamide Aromatic Ring

graphic file with name nihms275479t7.jpg
Cmpd R hEC50 (µM) % PHCCC Yieldc
(%)
25a phenyl 3.5 ± 0.7 69.7 ± 5.1 80
25b 2-fluorophenyl 3.5 ± 0.5 36.6 ± 1.8 3d
25c 2-chlorophenyl >10 25.8 ± 2.5 58
25d 2-methoxyphenyl Inactiveb 21.8 ± 1.0 87
25e 2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl Inactiveb 20.1 ± 0.2 24d
25f 3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl Inactiveb 18.2 ± 1.9 6d
25g 4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl 2.5 ± 0.5 26.6 ± 2.3 36
25h 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl >10 48.2 ± 4.6 5d
25i 4-methylphenyl 3.3 ± 0.2 48.7 ± 1.1 77
25j 4-fluorophenyl >10 27.6 ± 1.3 33d
25k 4-chlorophenyl 4.1 ± 0.6 43.6 ± 4.4 41
25l 4-tertbutylphenyl >10 32.6 ± 3.1 32
25m 4-acetylphenyl >10 42.9 ± 2.7 65
25n 2,4-dimethylphenyl 1.3 ± 0.5 42.8 ± 4.1 58
25o 2,5-dimethylphenyl 2.7 ± 0.6 32.5 ± 1.2 67
25p 2,5-dichlorophenyl Inactiveb 22.7 ± 0.7 67
25q 2-chloro-6-methylphenyl Inactiveb 18.1 ± 0.9 75
25r 2,6-dichlorophenyl Inactiveb 22.3 ± 1.7 23
25s 3,4-dimethylphenyl 3.2 ± 0.2 42.4 ± 5.0 67
25t 3-chloro-4-methylphenyl 3.4 ± 0.2 39.2 ± 1.2 43
25u 3,4-dichlorophenyl >10 24.3 ± 1.5 31
25v 3,4-difluorophenyl >10 27.0 ± 1.8 64
25w 4-chloro-3-fluorophenyl 4.5 ± 0.7 25.5 ± 1.2 53
25x 2,4-dichloro-5-methylphenyl 3.1 ± 0.9 43.6 ± 4.7 44
25y 4-chloro-2-fluoro-5-methylphenyl 2.7 ± 0.2 36.9 ± 2.7 36
25z benzyl >10 46.5 ± 4.8 12d
25aa 2,4-dichlorobenzyl 2.8 ± 0.01 34.4 ± 3.5 44
25ab isopropyl Inctiveb 17.5 ± 0.7 22d
25ac isobutyl Inactiveb 21.3 ± 0.9 27d
25ad 2-pyridyl Inactiveb 20.6 ± 0.3 36
25ae 2-thiophene 1.8 ± 0.3 52.9 ± 5.0 83
25af 2-furyl 3.3 ± 0.3 36.2 ± 2.2 98
25ag 3-pyridyl >10 25.6 ± 4.6 20
25ah 3-furyl >10 34.1 ± 3.6 70
25ai 3-thiophene >10 35.0 ± 3.3 79
25aj 2-acetamidothiazol-5-yl >10 46.4 ± 5.5 60
25ak 2,4-dimethylthiazol-5-yl >10 47.7 ± 2.1 73
25al 2-methyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)thiazol-5-yl
(±)-PHCCC
2.5 ± 0.4
3.1 ± 0.3
28.1 ± 4.8 49
a

EC50 and GluMax, are the average of at least three independent determinations performed in triplicate (Mean ± SEM shown in table). PHCCC is run as a control compound each day, and the maximal response generated in mGlu4 CHO cells in the presence of mGlu4 PAMs varies slightly in each experiment. Therefore, data were further normalized to the relative PHCCC response obtained in each day’s run.

b

Inactive compounds are defined as %GluMax did not surpass 2X the EC20 value for that day’s run.

c

All yields were obtained by reverse phase preparative HPLC unless otherwise stated and were optimized for purity (>95%) not yield.

d

Yields obtained by mass directed HPLC17