Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct 6;35(1):91–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01325.x

Table 2.

Unstandardized regression coefficients for path model, shown in Figure 1.

Path B (SE)
Heavy drinking → Problems 0.05 (0.01) p < 0.005
Motives → Heavy drinking 1.23 (0.27) p < 0.005
Self-efficacy → Heavy drinking −0.84 (0.27) p < 0.005
Alcohol sensitivity (SRE) → Heavy drinking 0.36 (0.09) p < 0.005
ALDH2 → Motives −0.59 (0.15) p < 0.005
ALDH2 → Self-efficacy 0.67 (0.18) p < 0.005
ALDH2 → Alcohol sensitivity (SRE) −1.81 (0.34) p < 0.005
ALDH2 → Heavy drinking 0.37 (0.30) p = 0.21
Gender → Motives 0.08 (0.14) p = 0.59
Gender → Self-efficacy −0.06 (0.19) p = 0.74
Gender → Alcohol sensitivity (SRE) −1.05 (0.36) p = 0.004
Gender → Heavy drinking −0.57 (0.34) p = 0.10
Ethnicity → Motives −0.06 (0.22) p = 0.79
Ethnicity → Self-efficacy 0.12 (0.31) p = 0.71
Ethnicity → Alcohol sensitivity (SRE) −0.59 (0.39) p = 0.13
Ethnicity → Heavy drinking −0.18 (0.42) p = 0.68
Motives with Self-efficacy −0.51 (0.14) p < 0.005