Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 17;286(8):6336–6344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.154195

TABLE 1.

Comparison of catalytic activity of wild-type and C298S mutant hAR for carbonyl reduction and alcohol oxidation reactions at 25 °C

The uncertainties are S.D. of the average value.

hAR Protein Substrate Km kcat kcat/Km
s−1
Wild-type dl-Glyceraldehyde 0.1 ± 0.01 mm 1.55 ± 0.01 14.5 mm−1s−1
C298S 1.2 ± 0.05 mm 3.72 ± 0.3 3.10 mm−1s−1
Wild-type d-Glucose 55.0 ± 6.0 mm 0.64 ± 0.05 0.011 mm−1s−1
C298S 800 ± 50.0 mm 0.42 ± 0.04 0.0005 mm−1s−1
Wild-type HNE 48.0 ± 4.0 μm 0.90 ± 0.06 0.019 μm−1 s−1
C298S 110.0 ± 8.0 μm 0.60 ± 0.02 0.006 μm−1 s−1
Wild-type Benzyl alcohol 1.62 ± 0.1 mm 0.35 ± .025 0.215 mm−1s−1
C298S 4.55 ± 0.3 mm 0.42 ± .02 0.092 mm−1s−1