. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 May;27(3):230–244. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.512285

Table 5.

Probability (p-value) of the observed correlation between sentence types in SPM and OM under the assumption of Rasch models with different factors. When the model is well fit to the date, the observed correlations fall within the range of correlations found in each model. Such correlations have non-significant p-values (at the 0.05 rejection level) and are shown in bold italic.

		Two tailed p-value
Sentence Type	Observed Correlation Across SPM and OM	Simple Rasch model	Sentence Grouping Factor	Task Factor	Sentence Grouping and Task Factor
A	0.572	0.036	*0.073*	0.036	*0.053*
PF	0.654	0.044	*0.08*	0.041	0.036
PT	0.138	*0.073*	0.0053	*0.14*	0.026
RG	0.635	*0.136*	*0.14*	*0.09*	*0.11*
RGB	0.518	*0.82*	*0.86*	*0.66*	*0.73*
RP	0.434	*0.44*	*0.52*	*0.4*	*0.44*
RPB	0.52	*0.35*	*0.38*	*0.28*	*0.31*
CO	0.70	0.019	0.0037	0.015	0.006
CS	0.518	*0.06*	0.029	*0.058*	0.038
SO	0.54	*0.94*	*0.41*	*0.73*	*0.48*
SS	0.45	*0.79*	*0.60*	*0.97*	*0.48*
Total number non-significant p values		8	8	8	7