Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 15;6(3):e17817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017817

Table 1. Conflict data for female bighorn sheep.

ID 15 17 21 06 08 01 10 22 02 11 05 16 12 09 26 25 29 27 28 24
15 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 4 1 1 2 2 9 2 5
17 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 1 1
21 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 3 2 1
06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
08 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 6 4 0
01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 3
02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 0
11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 1
16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0
25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Matrix of wins and losses for 20 female bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, with rows and columns arranged according to estimated dominance rankings [5], [6].