Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov 5;9(6):497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.021

TABLE 1.

Subject Characteristics, Overall and by Colon CFR Registry Site

Overall
(n=195)
CCO
(n=65)
MCR
(n=65)
USC
(n=65)
p value
Age at CRC diagnosis, years1 42.9 (6.1) 44.9 (4.2) 42.2 (6.6) 41.5 (6.8) 0.004
Women, N (%) 104 (53.3) 38 (58.5) 32 (49.2) 34 (52.3) 0.56
Proximal:distal tumor site, N (%)2 44 (25.3):130 (74.7) 15 (23.8):48 (76.2) 16 (25.8):46 (74.2) 13 (26.5):36 (73.5) 0.95
Amsterdam II criteria met, N (%)3 10 (5.1) 4 (6.2) 4 (6.2) 2 (3.1) 0.78
Deleterious/suspected deleterious mutation 11 (5.6) 3 (4.6) 3 (4.6) 5 (7.7) 0.79
MMR protein loss by IHC, N (%)4 0.86
    MLH1 deficient only 10 (6.5) 3 (5.6) 4 (6.3) 3 (8.1)
    MSH2 deficient only 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
    MSH6 deficient only 3 (1.9) 2 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.7)
    MLH1 and MSH2 deficient 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
    MLH1 and MSH6 deficient 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
    MSH2 and MSH6 deficient 5 (33.2) 2 (3.7) 2 (3.1) 1 (2.7)
    None deficient 137 (88.4) 47 (87.0) 58 (90.6) 32 (86.5)

CCO = Cancer Care Ontario; MCR = Mayo Clinic Rochester; USC = University of Southern California consortium.

1

mean (standard deviation);

2

percentages based on subjects with known tumor site (n=174);

3

percentages based on subjects with complete family history data (n=195);

4

percentages based on subjects with complete IHC data (n=155).

pair-wise comparisons between sites: CCO vs. MCR p=0.007; CCO vs. USC p=0.002; MCR vs. USC p=0.59.

excluding cases with tumor site not specified (CCO=2, MCR=3, USC=16).