Table 4.
Regression models predicting sedentary behaviors – Parent report
| Model | Variables | B | SE | β | F | Adjusted R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TV Viewing | Constant | 1.79 | 0.14 | 5.30*** | 0.22 | |
| TV rules | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.22* | |||
| Rules Agreement | −0.17 | 0.19 | −0.07 | |||
| Agreement x Rules Interaction | −0.25 | 0.15 | −0.15† | |||
| TV in bedroom | 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.18* | |||
| Gender (male) | −0.33 | 0.18 | −0.14 | |||
| Ethnicity (white) | −0.32 | 0.22 | −0.13* | |||
| Age | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |||
| Income (>50k) | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.07 | |||
| Site (Ref=San Diego) | ||||||
| Boston | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.11 | |||
| Cincinnati | .28 | 0.20 | .11 | |||
| Video Games | Constant | 0.95 | 0.13 | 5.46*** | 0.23 | |
| Total Rules | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |||
| Rules Agreement | −0.24 | 0.18 | −0.11 | |||
| Agreement x Rules Interaction | −0.17 | 0.08 | −0.16* | |||
| Game in bedroom | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.12 | |||
| Gender (male) | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.45*** | |||
| Ethnicity (white) | −0.30 | 0.20 | −0.13 | |||
| Age | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||
| Income (>50k) | −0.07 | 0.18 | −0.03 | |||
| Site (Ref=San Diego) | ||||||
| Boston | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.10 | |||
| Cincinnati | 0.10 | 0.19 | −.04 | |||
| Computer Use | Constant | 1.16 | 0.15 | 5.60*** | 0.21 | |
| Computer rules | −0.14 | 0.09 | −0.14 | |||
| Rules Agreement | −0.63 | 0.23 | −0.23** | |||
| Desktop computer in bedroom | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.02 | |||
| Gender (male) | 1.03 | 0.16 | 0.47*** | |||
| Ethnicity (white) | −0.32 | 0.20 | −0.15 | |||
| Age | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.02 | |||
| Income (>50k) | −0.18 | 0.17 | −0.08 | |||
| Site (Ref=San Diego) | ||||||
| Boston | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.06 | |||
| Cincinnati | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.01 | |||
Note.
= p < .05,
= p < .01,
= p < .001.
= p < .10.
Items in bedroom (TV, Game, Computer): 0 = not present, 1 = present.