Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 26;54(4):2867–2884. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.063

Table 4.

ROC statistics depicting the mean and std. deviations of TPR and FPR for 10 random noise frames generated for each combination of signal and noise: (a) Signal level = 1%; (b) Signal level = 3%. Clearly, w-ICA shows superior statistics for all combinations except lower TPR for 1% signal and higher levels of noise.

ROC - Signal Level = 1% ROC - Signal Level = 3%
Method ROC 6% Noise 8% Noise 10% Noise 12% Noise Method ROC 6% Noise 8% Noise 10% Noise 12% Noise
w-ICA TPR % 91.89 ± 0.65 90.83 ± 0.73 89.3 ± 0.7 86.67 ± 0.8 w-ICA TPR % 96.1 ± 0.12 96 ± 0.18 95.9 ± 0.18 95.77 ± 0.34
FPR % 0.602 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.03 0.59 ± 0.03 0.58 ± 0.04 FPR % 0.62 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.03 0.6 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.03
s-ICA TPR % 92.43 ± 0.35 92.09 ± 0.65 91.15 ± 0.43 91.1 ± 0.63 s-ICA TPR % 93.54 ± 0.16 93.49 ± 0.16 93.47 ± 0.16 93.44 ± 0.12
FPR % 1.05 ± 0.02 1.05 ± 0.05 1.25 ± 0.03 1.26 ± 0.39 FPR % 1.2 ± 0.02 1.21 ± 0.02 1.21 ± 0.02 1.21 ± 0.02
(a) (b)