Table 2.
Composite Primary End Point and Components of the Primary End Point.
4-Year Study Period (Including Periprocedural Period*) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
No. of Patients (%±SE) |
||||
CAS (N = 1262) | CEA (N = 1240) | Absolute Treatment Effect of CAS vs. CEA (95% CI) Percentage Points | P† | |
Stroke | ||||
Any stroke | 105 (10.2 ± 1.1) | 75 (7.9 ± 1.0) | 2.3 (−0.6 to 5.2) | 0.03 |
Major ipsilateral | 16 (1.4 ± 0.3) | 6 (0.5 ± 0.2) | 0.8 (0.1 to 1.6) | 0.05 |
Minor ipsilateral | 52 (4.5 ± 0.6) | 36 (3.5 ± 0.6) | 1.0 (−0.7 to 2.7) | 0.10 |
Primary end point (any periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death or post procedural ipsilateral stroke) | 85 (7.2 ± 0.8) | 76 (6.8 ± 0.8) | 0.4 (−1.7 to 2.6) | 0.51 |
For patients who received the assigned procedure within 30 days after randomization, the periprocedural period was defined as the 30-day period after the procedure. For patients who did not receive the assigned procedure within 30 days after randomization, the periprocedural period was defined as the 36-day period after randomization.
P values were calculated based upon significance of the hazard ratios.7