Skip to main content
. 2000 Nov 15;19(22):6141–6149. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6141

Table II. Statistics on data collection and phasing.

  Native EMTS
Data collectiona
 resolution (Å) (outer bin) 19–1.87 (1.97) 19–1.85 (1.95)
Rmergeb 0.073 (0.204) 0.042 (0.283)
Rmeasc 0.079 (0.220) 0.052 (0.336)
 <<I>/σ(<I>)> 24.5 (8.7) 29.4 (6.7)
 completeness (%) 99.8 (99.5) 99.1 (95.2)
 multiplicity 7.4 (7.0) 6.7 (5.9)
 Wilson plot B (Å2) 19 22
MIR phasing
 no. of sites   1
Rderivd   0.078
Rcullise   0.92
 phasing power: isomorphous (anomalous)f   0.73 (0.91)
 mean figure of merit 0.23  
 figure of merit after solvent  flattening (all data) 0.80  
Refinement
R (Rfree)g 0.185 (0.204)  
 <B> (Å2) 20  
Nreflections (Nfree) 11 944 (573)  
Natoms (Nwater) 1090 (109)  
 r.m.s.d. bond length (Å) 0.013  
 r.m.s.d. bond angle (°) 1.3  
 no. of Ramachandran violations 0  

aValues in parentheses apply to the high resolution shell.

bRmerge = ΣΣi |IhIhi|/ΣΣi Ih, where Ih is the mean intensity for reflection hi.

cRmeas = Σ √(n/n – 1)Σi |IhIhi|/ΣΣi Ih, the multiplicity weighted Rmerge (Diederichs and Karplus, 1997).

dRderiv = Σ|FPHFP|/ΣFP

eRcullis = Σ||FPHFP| – |FHcalc||/Σ|FPHFP|

fPhasing power = <|FHcalc|/phase-integrated lack of closure>.

gR = Σ|FPFcalc|/ΣFP