Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Empir Econ. 2011 Feb 1;40(1):119–140. doi: 10.1007/s00181-010-0422-3

Table 9. Reduced-form SRHS regression: HRS versus simulated samples.

HRS sample Simulated data


Est. SE Mean SD [1%; 99%]
Female −0.099 (0.048) −0.060 (0.046) [−0.172; 0.054]
Age spline, 60–69 0.016 (0.010) 0.002 (0.010) [−0.022; 0.026]
Age spline, 70–79 0.040 (0.015) 0.042 (0.015) [0.007; 0.078]
Age spline, 80–89 −0.052 (0.080) −0.005 (0.063) [−0.153; 0.158]
Nonwhite 0.040 (0.067) 0.129 (0.066) [−0.019; 0.285]
Hispanic 0.197 (0.095) 0.133 (0.091) [−0.061; 0.364]
Education < HS 0.184 (0.065) 0.139 (0.062) [−0.006; 0.283]
Education > HS 0.004 (0.055) −0.111 (0.057) [−0.237; 0.012]
SRHS, lag 1 1.029 (0.042) 0.822 (0.031) [0.752; 0.892]a
SRHS, lag 2 0.531 (0.040) 0.493 (0.031) [0.421; 0.562]
SRHS, lag 3 0.351 (0.039) 0.300 (0.031) [0.230; 0.375]
SRHS, lag 4 0.263 (0.038) 0.190 (0.033) [0.116; 0.268]
SRHS, lag 5 0.084 (0.036) 0.125 (0.031) [0.050; 0.195]
SRHS, lag 6 0.129 (0.033) 0.096 (0.030) [0.026; 0.170]
a

Est. parameter for HRS ∉ simulated [1%; 99%] interval