Skip to main content
. 2000 Dec 1;19(23):6287–6298. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.23.6287

Table I. Crystallographic data collection and structure refinement statistics for A.aeolicus Trbp111 and its E.coli homolog.

Crystal E.coli homolog
 
 
 
 
A.aeolicus Trbp111
  Native Hg acetate PtK2Cl4 TMPbAca 3-wavelength Pt derivative  
Space group P3221         C2
Unit cell a, c (Å) 41.2, 95.3 41.3, 95.2 40.9, 95.3 41.3, 95.6 41.6, 96.2 145.4,72.79 (b), 68.94,β = 91.93°
Wavelength (Å) 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.074, 1.0733, 1.055 1.08
Resolution (Å) 1.87 2.3 2.8 2.0 1.9 2.4
 last bin (Å) 1.94–1.87 2.38–2.3 2.85–2.8 2.07–2.0 1.93–1.9 2.44–2.40
Unique reflections 8064 4466 2514 6791 8024, 8032, 8478 26611
Completeness (%) 97.4 95.3 99.8 99.6 99.2, 99.3, 99.2 94.0
 last bin 96.1 80.5 100.0 100.0 100.0, 100.0, 98.9 88.4
Rsym (%)b 3.1 3.0 9.9 3.9 6.6, 6.3, 6.2 4.2
 last bin 11.6 8.3 36.1 10.2 32.9, 35.7, 45.2 36.1
<I/σ(I)> 19.0 15.8 5.8 20.6 12.0, 11.5, 10.9 9.7
 last bin 13.6 7.2 3.2 15.6 5.9, 6.3, 4.5 2.9
Final phasing statistics (7.0–2.0 Å)         (35–2.0 Å)  
Rder (%)c   12.3 29.7 10.1 1.9, 2.9d  
Ranom (%)e   3.9 6.8 2.0 3.6, 3.7d  
Rcullisf   0.82 0.81 0.71 0.65, 0.73d  
 number of sites   2 2 1 2  
 phasing powerg            
  isomorphous   0.96 1.35 1.15 1.1, 1.1d  
  anomalous   0.65 1.2 0.80 2.6, 2.6d  
 FOMh (overall, 20–2.0 Å)   0.54     0.32  
 FOM after density modification   (20–1.87 Å)   0.95        
Refinement statistics            
 resolution range (Å) 20–1.87         20–2.5
 no. of reflectionsi 7989         23 601
 no. of non-H atoms            
  protein 860         3216
  water 136         141
 r.m.s.d. bond length (Å) 0.007         0.005
 r.m.s.d. bond angle (°) 1.73         1.6
R-cryst (%)j, F > 0 15.8         18.9
R-free (%)k, F > 0 19.8         22.0
 Ramachandran plot (%)l            
  favored 96.1         89.9, 90.0, 90.2, 89.0
  allowed 3.9         10.1, 10.0, 9.8, 11.0
 mean b-factor for protein atoms   (Å3/Da) 20.0         26.8

aTMPbAc, trimethyl lead acetate.

bRsym = 100 × (∑hi|<I(h)> – I(h)i|) ÷ ∑hiI(h)i, where I(h)i is the ith measurement of reflection h and <I(h)> is the mean intensity of the n symmetry-related measurements.

cRder = 100 × (∑h|FPHFP|) ÷ ∑h|FP|, where FP and FPH are the observed structure factor amplitudes of the native and the derivative, respectively.

dFor MAD data, the dispersive differences were treated as isomorphous replacement information where the data collected at wavelength 1.074 Å are treated as native data (Terwilliger, 1994).

eRanom = 100 × (∑h|FPH+FPH–|) ÷ ∑h|<FPH>|, where FPH+ and FPH– are the Friedel pair observed structure factor amplitudes of the derivative at a given wavelength and <FPH> is their average.

fRCullis = ∑h[|FH| – (|FPH| – |FP|)] ÷ ∑h(|FPH| – |FP|), where |FH| is the calculated heavy atom structure factor for reflection h.

gPPiso = (1/Nrefl)∑h[||FPH| – |FP|| ÷ <_UNICODE:8747>0(|FPHFPHcalc|)P(ϕ)d(ϕ) ], where P(ϕ) is the probability of a phase value of ϕ for reflection h. PPano = (1/Nrefl) ∑h[|ΔobsANO| ÷ <_UNICODE:8747>0(|ΔobsANO – ΔcalcANO|)P(ϕ)d(ϕ), where ΔobsANO and ΔcalcANO are the Friedel pair differences in the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively, for reflection h.

hFOM, figure of merit.

iReflections with F > 0 were used in refinement.

jCrystallographic R factor = 100 × [∑h||Fobs(h)| – |Fcalc(h)||] ÷ ∑h|Fobs(h)|, where Fobs(h) and Fcalc(h) are the observed structure factor amplitude and the structure factor amplitude calculated from the model, respectively.

kThe free R-factor was calculated using 90% of the data in the last round of refinement.

lThe Ramachandran plot was generated in PROCHECK (Howard et al., 1987).