Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Neurol. 2011 Mar;68(3):343–350. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.375

Table 6.

CDR scores in the cross-sectional validation sample (n=50), by long vs. short (SIST-M) interview format.

Long format: N (%) Short format: N (%) Agreement by κ or ICC (95% CI)

CDR Sum-of-Boxes Mean (SD), range = 1.34 (1.32), 0–4.5 Mean (SD), range = 0.81 (1.05), 0–4.0 0.73 (0.58–0.84)
- 0 17 (34.0) 20 (40.0)
- 0.5 4 (8.0) 11 (22.0)
- 1.0, 1.5 11 (22.0) 12 (24.0)
- 2.0, 2.5 10 (20.0) 2 (4.0)
- 3.0, 3.5 6 (12.0) 4 (8.0)
- ≥ 4.0 2 (4.0) 1 (2.0)

CDR Global rating 0.70 (0.52–0.88)
- 0 18 (36.0) 23 (46.0)
- 0.5 31 (62.0) 27 (54.0)
- 1.0 1 (2.0) 0 (0)

Memory 0.71 (0.58–0.84)
- 0 18 (36.0) 23 (46.0)
- 0.5 22 (44.0) 21 (42.0)
- 1.0 10 (20.0) 6 (12.0)

Orientation 0.51 (0.29–0.74)
- 0 33 (66.0) 41 (82.0)
- 0.5 16 (32.0) 9 (18.0)
- 1.0 1 (2.0) 0 (0)

Judgment and Problem-solving 0.61 (0.43–0.79)
- 0 26 (52.0) 35 (70.0)
- 0.5 20 (40.0) 14 (28.0)
- 1.0 4 (8.0) 1 (2.0)

Community Affairs 0.66 (0.45–0.87)
- 0 35 (70.0) 39 (78.0)
- 0.5 13 (26.0) 9 (18.0)
- 1.0 2 (4.0) 2 (4.0)

Home and Hobbies 0.46 (0.24–0.67)
- 0 26 (52.0) 41 (82.0)
- 0.5 20 (40.0) 8 (16.0)
- 1.0 4 (8.0) 1 (2.0)

Personal Care* N/A
- 0 50 (100) 50 (100)
- 1.0 0 (0) 0 (0)
*

κ was not calculated, as no participants were rated as impaired (100% absolute agreement).