Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):33–45. doi: 10.1037/a0021133

Table 3.

Results of Longitudinal Generalized Estimating Equations for Covariates, Genotypes, Parenting, and Genotype × Parenting Interactions Predicting Conduct disorder Symptoms During Assessment Years 6–9

Predictor
β
95% Confidence Interval
z
p <
Time (assessment waves) −0.07 (−0.18 – 0.04) −1.21 .23
Site −0.34 (−0.93 – 0.25) −1.13 .26
Cohort −0.45 (−0.94 – 0.05) −1.77 .08
Child’s age in year 1 0.24 (−0.09 – 0.57) 1.42 .16
Child’s sex −0.54 (−1.09 – 0.02) −1.89 .06
ADHD symptoms in year 1 0.08 (0.03 – 0.14) 3.10 .002
Family income (log) −0.15 (−0.35 – 0.05) −1.47 .15
African American1 −0.19 (−0.78 – 0.40) −0.63 .53
Other ethnic group1 0.16 (−0.54 – 0.87) 0.46 .65
Parent interviewer blind −0.05 (−0.42 – 0.32) −0.25 .81
Youth interviewer blind 0.07 (−0.24 – 0.38) 0.47 .65
9/9 genotype2 4.86 (3.40 – 6.32) 6.52 .0001
9/10 genotype2 0.91 (−0.49 – 2.31) 1.27 .21
Positive parenting3 0.02 (−0.28 – 0.31) 0.10 .92
Negative parenting3 0.12 (−0.21 – 0.45) 0.71 .48
Child disruptive behavior3 0.014 (−0.01 – 0.02) 0.89 .38
9/9 × positive parenting −0.80 (−1.30 – −0.30) −3.13 .002
9/9 × negative parenting −1.13 (−1.71 – −0.549) −3.79 .0002
9/10 × positive parenting −0.28 (−0.75 – 0.18) −1.19 .24
9/10 × negative parenting −0.04 (−0.482 – 0.40) −0.17 .87
1

Contrast group is non-Hispanic white

2

Contrast group is 10/10 genotype

3

Observed during mother-child interaction task in year 1

Note: Conduct disorder symptoms = number of symptoms reported in each assessment wave by either the parent or the youth (combined); estimates of main effects for genotype and parenting are changed by the presence of interaction terms; all tabled tests of significance used 1 df.