Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2010 Dec;160(6):1163–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.08.002

Table 3.

Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for Incident Cardiovascular Disease per copy of the FTO Risk Allele (A)

All Women
No. of events HR for CVD (95% CI) P
Crude model (n=21,674) 664 1.11 (0.99–1.24) 0.06
Model 1* (n=19,004) 560 1.14 (1.01–1.28) 0.03
Model 2 (n=19,004) 560 1.10 (0.97–1.23) 0.13
Model 3 (n=18,826) 555 1.09 (0.97–1.23) 0.15

Women Expending >8.8 MET hours/week
Crude model (n=10,841) 263 1.01 (0.85–1.20) 0.92
Model 1* (n=9,486) 223 0.98 (0.81–1.18) 0.82
Model 2 (n=9,486) 223 0.96 (0.79–1.16) 0.68
Model 3 (n=9,486) 222 0.96 (0.79–1.16) 0.67

Women Expending ≤ 8.8 MET hours/week
Crude model (n=10,833) 401 1.18 (1.02–1.35) 0.02
Model 1* (n=9,518) 337 1.26 (1.08–1.46) 0.004
Model 2 (n=9,518) 337 1.19 (1.02–1.38) 0.03
Model 3 (n=9,431) 333 1.19 (1.02–1.39) 0.03

Crude model adjusted for age and randomized treatment assignment.

*

Model 1: crude model additionally adjusted for alcohol use, caloric intake, saturated fat and fiber intake, smoking, and parental history of myocardial infarction.

Model 2: Model 1, additionally adjusted for BMI and BMI2.

Model 3: Model 2, additionally adjusted for cholesterol lowering medication, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, hsCRP, menopausal status, post-menopausal hormone therapy, hypertension, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.