Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Behav Neurol. 2010 Dec;23(4):218–223. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181d748d7

Table 2.

Percentage of the variance in central auditory processing explained by measures of executive functioning, controlling for age, education, gender, and worse pure tone average.

Central Auditory Processing AR2*
SSI-ICM Worse Ear
 Composite score 8%
 Trails B 8%
 Clock drawing 3%
 Stroop Color and Word 3%
 Digits backwards (3 digits) 0%
 Digits backwards (4 digits) 1%
 Animal fluency 3%
 Serial subtractions 2%
DSI Worse Ear
 Composite score 21%
 Trails B 14%
 Clock drawing 9%
 Stroop Color and Word 8%
 Digits backwards (3 digits) 4%
 Digits backwards (4 digits) 4%
 Animal fluency 5%
 Serial subtractions 8%
DDT Worse Ear
 Composite score 16%
 Trails B 13%
 Clock drawing 0%
 Stroop Color and Word 7%
 Digits backwards (3 digits) 3%
 Digits backwards (4 digits) 3%
 Animal fluency 3%
 Serial subtractions 5%
*

Adjusted R2