Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.016

Table 4.

Multiple regression models including dependence, demographic, contextual variables and treatment

Measure Failure to Reach Initial Abstinencea (n=1429) Lapseb,c (n=1259) Relapsec,d (n=930) Point-Prevalence Abstinencea (n=1504)

OR p 95% CI HR P 95% CI HR P 95% CI OR p 95% CI
FTND 1.11* .02 1.02, 1.21 1.03 .08 1.00, 1.06 1.08* <.001 1.04, 1.13 1.16* <.001 1.10, 1.23
Education .79 .30 .50, 1.24 .80* .01 .67, .94 .91 .41 .73, 1.14 .69* .01 .53, .90
Marital Status 1.18 .36 .82, 1.70 .87* .05 .76, 1.00 1.02 .81 .86, 1.22 .78* .04 .61, 1.00
Gender 1.13 .51 .79, 1.62 1.24* .003 1.08, 1.42 1.29* .01 1.07, 1.54 1.29* .04 1.01, 1.62
Age 1.00 .73 .98, 1.01 1.00 .87 .99, 1.01 1.00 .51 .99, 1.01 .99* .02 .98, 1.00
Ethnicity .41* <.001 .28, .62 .80* .02 .67, .96 1.00 .98 .79, 1.28 .64 .10 .46, .90
Smoking in the home 2.00* <.001 1.34, 2.98 .99 .93 .86, 1.15 .92 .37 .77, 1.10 1.03 .82 .80, 1.32
Smoking at work 1.05 .78 .74, 1.49 1.15* .04 1.01, 1.32 .93 .43 .79, 1.11 .99 .91 .78, 1.24
SRRS 1.001 .09 1.000, 1.003 1.00 .65 1.00, 1.00 1.00 .28 1.00, 1.00 1.00 .76 1.00, 1.00
Proportion of Smokers in the Social Network .98 .73 .88, 1.09 1.05* .03 1.01, 1.09 1.02 .35 .97, 1.08 1.05 .17 .98, 1.12
# of supportive individuals in the social networke .96 .27 .88, 1.09 .94* .<.001 .91, .98 .91* .003 .86, .97 .96 .10 .91, 1.01
*

significant (p<.05)

a

Conducted using logistic regression

b

Excludes individuals who did not achieve initial abstinence

c

Conducted using proportional hazards survival analysis

d

Excludes individuals who did not lapse

e

Results do not include interaction with treatment period