Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Nov 10;35(2):326–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01348.x

Figure 5. Subtle line differences in reinstatement of responding for ethanol.

Figure 5

Responding on the previously active (panel A) and inactive (panel B) levers are depicted. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of responding for WSP-1 (n = 11) or WSR-1 (n = 10) mice. A collapsed baseline composed of the sessions immediately preceding the reinstatement tests is shown (the three baseline sessions did not significantly differ from one another). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus respective within line baseline value; ##P < 0.01 versus within line oral prime value; Tukey's post-hoc test.