Table 3.
Summary of modulation response characteristics between core fields
| AI | R | P, AI vs. R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAM | |||
| Responsive, % | 99 | 97 | n.s. |
| Synchronized, % | 98 | 94 | 0.02 |
| Band-pass rMTF, % | 78 | 74 | n.s. |
| rBMF | |||
| Median, Hz | 10 | 5 | <0.0001 |
| Mean, Hz | 45 | 19 | |
| tBMF | |||
| Median, Hz | 5 | 2 | <0.0001 |
| Mean, Hz | 13 | 4.8 | |
| Sync cutoff, median, Hz | 46 | 10 | <0.0001 |
| SFM | |||
| Responsive, % | 100 | 99 | n.s. |
| synchronized, % | 99 | 94 | 0.03 |
| bandpass rMTF, % | 78 | 69 | n.s. |
| rBMF | |||
| Median, Hz | 7 | 4 | 0.005 |
| Mean, Hz | 34 | 21 | |
| tBMF | |||
| Median, Hz | 5 | 2 | <0.0001 |
| Mean, Hz | 18 | 8 | |
| Sync cutoff, median, Hz | 31 | 18 | 0.0003 |
rMTF, rate MTF; rBMF and tBMF, rate-based and temporal-based, respectively, best modulation frequency.