Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 3;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-11-13

Table 2.

Comparisons between apo and holo heme protein structures

holo-chain volume
3)
surface
area (Å2)
Rvsa apo-chain volume
3)
surface area (Å2) Rvsa sequence identity% RMSD
(Å)
1KBIA 458.1 432 1.060 1SZFB 1039.3 708.3 1.468 99 0.40
1N45A 1634.7 1139.3 1.435 1S8CD 845.1 634.4 1.332 100 0.86
1N5UA * * * 3CX9A * * * 100 0.60
2ITFA 721.7 521 1.385 2ITEB 803.4 551 1.457 100 0.60
2NWBA * * * 1ZEEB * * * 96 0.75
2OFRX 1211.1 857.4 1.413 2OFMX 783.3 642.7 1,219 100 1.03
2R7AA 1362.6 963.4 1.414 2RG7D 1558.1 1019.6 1.528 100 0.91
2ZDOA 808.7 553.9 1.460 1XBWD 766.9 544.2 1.409 99 0.59
3CQVA 1638.3 1099 1.490 2V7CA 537.1 436.2 1.232 94 2.32
3EMMA 399 383.1 1.042 2A13A 910.8 635.2 1.434 100 0.53

a Rvs: ratio between volume and surface area

* Data not shown because CASTp predicts a very large cavity, covering several pockets.