Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010 Nov;39(6):726–740. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2010.517168

TABLE 4. Analysis Summary of Standardized Scores for Antisaccade Error Rate and Attentional Blink Dual Task Probe Detection.

Analysis of Standardized Antisaccade + Blink Scores* Dual Task Probe Detection Antisaccade Error Rate

Model Diagnostic Criteria n ADD Group Pairwise Comparisons Task × Group p (η2) Pairwise p Group p Pairwise p Group p Pairwise p
1 Conners (mean [P,T]) Hyper Tscores<50 15 ADD v ADHD-C .022 (.061) .001 0.016 .004 <.001 .104
Controls v ADD .573 .037 .148
Controls v ADHD-C <.001 .201 <.001
2 KSAD (P) Hyper Symptoms <2 23 ADD v ADHD-C .024 (.055) .007 n.s. -- <.001 .117
Controls v ADD .573 .034
Controls v ADHD-C <.001 <.001
3 DSM-IV PI 34 ADHD-PI v ADHD-C .029 (.049) .019 n.s. -- <.001 .162
Controls v ADHD-PI .193 .007
Controls v ADHD-C <.001 <.001

P=Parent, T=Teacher, Hyper= Hyperactivity

*

Antisaccade condition error rate and attentoinal blink dual task probe detection (A′) scores were transformed to z-scores; z-scores served as the dependent variable in a repeated measures ANCOVA with task as the within group factor.