Table 2.

Linear regression models showing personality domains and subjective social support as predictors of MADRS score (n=108)

	Model 1 NEUROTICISM			Model 2 OPENNESS			Model 3 CONSCIENTIOUSNESS			Model 4 EXTRAVERSION			Model 5 AGREEABLENESS
Parameter	Estimate	Std Err	t ,p *	Estimate	Std Err	t, p*	Estimate	Std Err	t, p*	Estimate	Std Err	t, p*	Estimate	Std Err	t, p*
Intercept	67.36	26.32	2.56, 0.0120	67.02	19.41	3.45, 0.0008	20.65	9.70	2.13, 0.0356	22.61	9.39	2.41, 0.0179	16.20	10.39	1.56, 0.1221
Neo Domain	−0.85	0.39	−2.21, 0.0291	−0.93	0.34	−2.75, 0.0071	0.14	0.07	−2.07, 0.0411	−0.29	0.08	−3.47, 0.0008	0.10	0.08	1.16, 0.2479
Subjective Social Support	−3.11	0.98	−3.18, 0.0020	−2.54	0.71	−3.58, 0.0005	−0.65	0.21	−3.08, 0.0027	−0.48	0.22	−2.21, 0.0290	−0.85	0.21	−4.03, 0.0001
NEO* Subjective Social Support	0.04	0.02	2.70, 0.0081	0.03	0.01	2.52, 0.0133
Sex	−1.03	1.47	−0.70, 0.4842	−0.15	1.48	−0.10, 0.9193	0.35	1.49	0.24, 0.8136	1.32	1.48	0.89, 0.3731	0.20	1.51	0.13, 0.8940
Age	0.11	0.12	0.98, 0.3310	0.12	0.12	0.97, 0.3340	0.14	0.12	1.16, 0.2473	0.15	0.12	1.25, 0.2142	0.12	0.12	0.94, 0.3484

The t-tests for each parameter in Models 1 and 2 have 101 degrees of freedom; t-tests for each parameter in Models 3, 4 and 5 have 102 degrees of freedom;