Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;66(2):281–286. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000200017

Table 3.

Accuracy and the staging system on predicting good response to initial therapy.

Measurements TNM%(CI 95%) MACIS%(CI 95%) AMES% (CI 95%) ATA% (CI 95%)
Sensitivity 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85)
Specificity 37.5 (23.95‐ 52.65) 35.42 (22.16‐ 50.54) 37.5 (23.95‐ 52.65) 33.33 (20.40‐48.41)
Positive predictive value 34.78 (21.35‐ 50.25) 34.04 (20.86‐ 49.31) 34.78 (21.35‐50.25) 33.33 (20.40‐ 48.41)
Negative predictive value 94.74 (73.97‐ 99.87) 94.44 (72.71‐ 99.86) 94.74 (73.97‐ 99.87) 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85)

95% CI – 95 confidence interval