Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 28;108(11):4346–4351. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017274108

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Empirical persistence-time distributions. (A) A schematic representation of the variables that can be measured from empirical data over a time window ΔTw: τ, persistence times that start and end inside the observational window, and τ′′ , which comprises τ and all the portions of persistence times seen inside the time window that start or/and end outside. Times to local extinction τe are also presented. (B) Breeding birds and (C) herbaceous plants probability density function p(t) of τ (green), τ′′ (blue), and persistence time τ (red). Filled circles and solid lines show observational distributions and fits, respectively. The best fit is achieved with pτ(t) ∝ t-α with α = 1.83 ± 0.02 and α = 1.78 ± 0.08 for breeding birds and herbaceous plants, respectively. Note that previous estimates (6) for B are revisited here in the light of the tools developed and of a longer dataset. The spatial scale of analysis is A = 10,000 km2 and ΔTw = 41 y for B and A = 1 m2 and ΔTw = 38 y for C. The finiteness of the time window imposes a cutoff to pτ(t) and an atom of probability in t = ΔTw to pτ′′(t), which corresponds to the fraction of species that are always present during the observational time. pτ(t) and pτ(t) have been shifted in the log–log plot for clarity.