Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Stem Cells. 2009 Jul;27(7):1487–1495. doi: 10.1002/stem.92

Table 1.

Gene expression was comprehensively profiled in 67LR bright highly tumorigenic cancer cells and 67LR dim cells

Source Identifier Pathway P Genes up in 67LR bright Genes down in 67LR bright
KEGG 4510 Focal adhesion <10−5 ITGA6, ITGAV, CAV1, LAMB3, LAMC2, PGF, SPP1, CAV3, IGFIR, LAMA3 BIRC3
KEGG 4110 Cell cycle <10−5 SFN, CDKNIC CDC2
KEGG 4012 ErbB signaling pathway .0009 NRG2, HBEGF, MYC AREG
KEGG 4330 Notch signaling pathway .0004 DLL1, MFNG
KEGG 4150 mTOR signaling pathway .005 HIF1A, PGF, DDIT4
KEGG 4310 Wnt signaling pathway .0045 MYC, NFATC1, WNT10A PRKACB
GO 6979 Response to oxidative stress .0013 APOE, SOD2, HMOX1, PRNP, KRT1 IDH1
GO 6916 Anti-apoptosis <10−5 APOE, NOL3, NRG2, BNIP3, SOCS3, HMOX1, PRNP, CRYAB, IGF1R BIRC3
GO 6281 DNA repair <10−5 SOD2, FANCE
GO 1558 Cell growth .002 IGFBP2, DLC PRSS2, PLCE1, ING3

The table lists selected functional pathways that were significantly enriched (adjusted p < .05) among differentially expressed genes between 67LR bright and dim cells, along with selected genes in each pathway showing statistically significant (adjusted p < 0.001) differential expression. Genes are listed according to official symbols in descending order of statistical significance. We added Kremen2 to the Wnt pathway category, but this addition was not considered in statistical analysis.