Table 3.
Variable | Step 1: Core model only |
Step 2: Including the significant buffering effect |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE B | β | t | B | SE B | β | t | |
Core model | ||||||||
Constant | 0.04 | 0.02 | – | 2.08a | 0.04 | 0.02 | – | 2.01a |
Problem behavior | 0.47 | 0.05 | 0.29 | 9.69c | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.27 | 9.04c |
Gender | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.06 | −2.31a | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.06 | −2.38a |
Academic achievement | −0.08 | 0.03 | −0.09 | −3.05b | −0.07 | 0.03 | −0.08 | −2.64b |
School engagement | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.13 |
Peer rejection | 0.47 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 2.36a | 0.61 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 3.03b |
Peer acceptance | 1.69 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 6.29c | 1.54 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 5.66c |
Best friends’ problem behavior | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.15 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.49 |
Best friends’ academic achievement | −0.09 | 0.03 | −0.08 | −2.66b | −0.09 | 0.03 | −0.08 | −2.72b |
Parental monitoring knowledge | −0.13 | 0.03 | −0.16 | −5.28c | −0.17 | 0.03 | −0.21 | −6.16c |
Peer Acceptance × Peer Rejection | 7.30 | 3.47 | 0.06 | 2.11a | 9.27 | 3.61 | 0.08 | 2.57b |
Moderators | ||||||||
Parental Monitoring × Peer Rejection | – | – | – | – | −1.51 | 0.32 | −0.21 | −4.69c |
Parental Monitoring × Peer Acceptance | – | – | – | – | −0.86 | 0.44 | −0.06 | −1.93 |
Peer Acceptance × Peer Rejection × Parental Monitoring | – | – | – | – | −28.82 | 5.89 | −0.22 | −4.90c |
All predictors were measured in Grade 6. For Step 1, R2 =0.23, adjusted R2 =0.23, ΔR2 =0.23, F(10, 1,267)=38.07, p<0.001. For Step 2, R2 =0.25, adjusted R2 =0.24, ΔR2 =0.02, F(3, 1,264)=9.06, p<0.001. Gender is coded 0 for males and 1 for females.
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001