Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 15;52(4):493–506. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq167

Table 3.

Reported Associations with Pharmacy-Based Adherence Measures (PAMs) in High-Income Countries

Study (year) Design Type of care Region ART naive (%) ART regimen (%)a PAM category PAM descriptionin study PAM duration, monthsb Sample size Key findingsc
Maher et al [42] (1999) Retrospective cohort VA, minor costs USA No (26) PI (100) PPU Adherence' occurred if the patient consistently filled 4 prescriptions on time “nonadherent did not do this) 4 (varied) 205 Adherent status predicted VL suppression (P < .01) and CD4 cell count increase (P < .01), whereas ”nonadherent” status predicted VL suppression (P < .05) but not CD4 increase over 5–9 months of follow-up
Singh et al [46] (1999) Prospective cohort VA, private USA No (7) NR PPU Adherence occurred if refills picked-up/refills prescribed was >90% 6 (varied) 123 Adherence predicted greater change in the CD4 cell count (P < .05)
Descamps et al [33] (2000) Case-control study in an RCT Free France Yes PI, 2NRTIf PC (Pills prescribed – remnant pills)/pills to cover the interval 6 (0–6) 116 Mean PAM for zidovudine and indinavir predicted VL rebounde (P < .05)
Low-Beer et al [41] (2000) Retrospective cohort Public Canada Yes NNRTI, PI (NR) MPR Months ART prescribed/months follow-up in 1st year 12 (0–12) 886 Increasing PAM strata (<70%,70%-80%, 80%-90%, 90%-95%, and 95%-100%) predicted VL suppression during follow-up (median duration of follow-up, 19 months; P < .01)
Liu et al [40] (2001) Prospective cohort Private USA Yes NNRTI, PI (NR) PC 1 – [(actual pills – expected pills)/pills per dose/prescribed doses for the period ] 2 (0–2)
6 (0–6)
108 1. Increasing PAM strata predicted VL suppression at 2 and 6 months (P < .01)
2. no difference was shown between PC and MEMS at predicting VL at 2 and 6 months, but both were superior to self-reported adherence at 2 months (P < .01)
McNabb et al [43] (2001) Prospective cohort Private USA No PI (63), NNRTI, 2NRTI PC (1) doses taken/doses prescribed, OR if return after 30 days, then(2) doses taken/doses required for interval 3 (varied) 40 PAM and self-report changes were not associated with VL change, whereas increasing MEMS adherence was associated with decreasing VL (P < .05) and VL suppression (P < .01)
Hogg et al [38] (2002) Retrospective cohort Public Canada Yes PI (73), NNRTI MPR Months ART prescribed/months follow-up in first year 12 (0–12) 1282 PAM adherence of <75% predicted mortality, or mortality plus new AIDS diagnosis, over maximum follow-up of 50 months (P < .01)
Alcoba et al [30] (2003) Retrospective cohort NR Spain No PI (100) MPR Patient was “ nonadherent” if (days in the interval – days dispensed)/days in the interval is >10% 3 (varied) 106 “Nonadherent” status, self-report, and ARV plasma levels were not associated with VL
Wood et al [48] (2003) Retrospective cohort Public Canada Yes NNRTI, PI (NR) MPR Months ART prescribed/months follow-up in 1st year 12 (0–12) 1422 PAM adherence of >95% predicted time to VL suppression and time to VL rebounde over follow-up, which was NR but variable and maximum of 67 months (P < .01)
Grossberg et al [37] (2004) Retrospective cohort VA, minor costs USA No(35) NNRTI, PI, 3NRTI (NR) MPR (Total pills/daily number of pills)/days between refills 3 (varied) 110 Self-reported adherence and increasing PAM strata predicted VL reductions (P < .01), apart from self-report in ART naive
Kitahata et al [39] (2004) Retrospective cohort Free ART USA Yes PI (78), NNRTI MPR Mean for all ARVs of [(1 – days without ARV)/days in the interval] 6 (0–6) 212 1. Increasing PAM strata (<70%, 70%-90%, and >90%) predicted viral reboundh (P < .01) and higher CD4 cell counts over 12–24 months (P < .05)2. PAM adherence <70% predicted new AIDS or death, compared with PAM adherence of >70%, over 24 months (P < .01) (but PAM adherence of 70%-90%, compared with >90%, did not)
Wood et al [47] (2004) Retrospective cohort Public Canada Yes PI (69), NNRTI MPR Months ART prescribed/months follow-up in 1st year 12 (0–12) 1522 PAM adherence <75% predicted a lower increase in the CD4 cell count over 24 months (P < .01), whereas PAM strata >75% increasingly predicted increases in the CD4 cell count over 24 months (P < .01)
Fairley et al [34] (2005) Retrospective cohort Public Australia No NNRTI, PI (NR) MPR Days ART prescribed/days in the interval Variable range, 12-44 752 Increasing PAM and self-reported adherence predicted VL suppression (P < .01)
Fletcher et al [35] (2005) RCT (Prior VF on PI regimen) Free ART USA No NNRTI + PI (100) PC (doses dispensed – doses returned)/doses dispensed 1(0–1) 220 PAM did not predict VL changes at 4 months; self-reported adherence (P < .05) (n = 244) and ARV plasma levels (P < .05) (n = 180) predicted VL changes at 4 months, wheras MEMS did not (n = 62)
Harrigan et al [10] (2005) Retrospective cohort Public Canada Yes PI (74), NNRTI MPR Months ART prescribed/months follow-up in 1st year 12 (0–12) 1191 PAM adherence of 80%-90% is the highest predictor of single and multiple category HIVDR over 24 months, compared with PAM adherence of 0%-20% (P < .01)
King et al [28] (2005) RCT Free ART Multi- continent Yes PI (100) PC Pills consumed/pills expected to be consumed Variable range, 2 – 3 590 Decreasing PAM strata increasingly predicted VFg (P < .01);the mean PAM adherence rate was lower in persons with detectable HIVDR to PI and/or 3TC (P < .01)
Inciardi et al [29] (2005) Retrospective cohort Private USA No NNRTI (56), PI MPR Sum of (interval days – ARV days) for all ARVs/sum of interval days for all ARVsi Variableh 94 Decreasing PAM adherence was associated with VL increase (P < .01)
Gross et al [36] (2006) Retrospective cohort Public Canada No NNRTI, PI (NR) MPR (Days ART [any ARV] dispensed between 3 refills +30)/days between 3 refills Variable
range, 2-6
1634 Decreasing PAM strata (<70%, 70%-95%, and >95%) in a 2-6 observed interval, predicted a higher proportion with VFd (P < .01)
Yes NNRTI, PI (NR) MPR (Days ART [any ARV] dispensed +30)/fays between refills Variable
median, 29
1634 PAM adherence <95% (treated as a time-varying variable, with or without a 30-day grace period) predicted viral rebounde over the period of observation (P < .05)
Braithwaite et al [27] (2007) Retrospective cohort VA, minor costs USA Yes PI (58), NNRTI, 3NRTI MPR Days ART prescribed/days in interval 12 (0–12) 6394 Increasing PAM strata increasingly predicted VL change, VL suppression, or changes in the CD4 cell count at 12 months
Townsend et al [31] (2007) Retrospective cohort VA, minor costs USA No PI(50), NNRTI, NRTI MPR Days ART prescribed/days in the interval 6 (varied) 58 PAM was not associated with VL; PAM adherence <70% was associated with changes in the CD4 cell count (P < .05), but PAM adherence of 70%-90%, compared with >90%, was not
Saberi et al [45] (2008) Retrospective cohort Private USA No NNRTI (100) MPR (Pills dispensed/pills prescribed per day)/days between refills Variable range, 3-18 151 PAM adherence >85% maintained VL suppression in 8 of 10 patients between 2 VL measurements
Lima et al [11] (2009) Retrospective cohort Public Canada Yes PI (64), NNRTI MPR Days ART prescribed/days of follow-up Variable maximum, 30 903 PAM adherence <95% predicted mortality over follow-up period (maximum, 55 months) (P < .05)
Nellen et al [44] (2009) Retro- and Prospective cohort NR Holland No NNRTI (58), PI, 3NRTI PPU ART dispensed/ART prescribed 6 (varied) 115 PAM adherence <85% did not predict VFg (but did for an ART-naïve subgroup; P < .01) over 24 months; self-reported adherence and ARV plasma levels did not predict VFg over 24 months
Cambiano et al [32] (2010) Retrospective cohort Public England No PI(47), NNRTI, NRTI MPR Days with ≥3 ARV prescriptions/study interval 6 (varied) 1632 PAM strata <95% predicted (P < .01) viral rebound, but PAM adherence of 95%-99% did not, h over the subsequent 9 months, compared with PAM adherence of 100%

NOTE. ART, antiretroviral therapy; ARV, antiretroviral; HIVDR, HIV drug resistance; MEMS medication event monitoring system; MPR, Medication possession ratio; NNRTI, nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor; NR, not reported; PC, pill count; PI, protease inhibitor; PPU, pill pick-up; RCT, randomized control trial; 3NRTI, triple nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor; 3TC, lamivudine; 2NRTI, double nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor; VA, veterans affairs hospital; VF, virological failure; VL, viral load.

a

Data are ART regimens for that study. The numbers in parentheses represent the percentages of subjects receiving the predominant regimen.

b

Duration of adherence assessment, with the months over which assessed in parentheses. If there was a variable duration of adherence assessment, than the median, mean, or range is listed.

c

The number after ”PAM” is the percentage adherence.

d

Two viral loads separated in time above threshold.

e

Two viral loads above threshold after previous VL suppression.

f

All patients received triple-drug PI regimens for 3 months and were then randomized to receive double-NRTI (50%) or 1 PI plus 1 NRTI (36%) or to continue the PI regimen (14%).

g

Single viral load above threshold.

h

Single viral load above threshold after previous VL suppression.

i

“Interval days” was the sum of multiple 3-month periods prior to VL tests performed over a 2-year period, and “ARV days” was the sum of ARVs prescribed over these same periods.