Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 21.
Published in final edited form as: Pharm Biol. 2009 Jan;47(1):53–60. doi: 10.1080/13880200802415483

Investigation of antimicrobial and protease-inhibitory activity from cultured cyanobacteria

George Chlipala 1, Shunyan Mo 1, Esperanza J Carcache de Blanco 1,2, Aiko Ito 1, Stanley Bazarek 1, Jimmy Orjala 1
PMCID: PMC3061310  NIHMSID: NIHMS248025  PMID: 21430788

Abstract

A culture collection of cyanobacteria has been established at the University of Illinois at Chicago. This collection includes marine, terrestrial, and freshwater strains and contains representatives of the five orders of cyanobacteria: Chroococcales, Pleurocapsales, Oscillatoriales, Nostocales, and Stigonematales. In this study, extracts from a subset of 61 strains, 16 marine and 45 freshwater/terrestrial, were evaluated against three current protease targets, i.e. 20S proteasome and two SARS viral proteases, two important bacterial targets, i.e. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Bacillus anthracis, and in the Artemia salina toxicity assay. In total, extracts of 12 strains possessed significant levels of activity in one or more targets. The overwhelming majority of active extracts (11 of 12) were from either freshwater or terrestrial forms of cyanobacteria, with the greater part of these (9 of 12) being heterocyst-forming strains. These results further support the use of cultured cyanobacteria as a source of biologically active natural products.

Keywords: Anthrax, antimicrobial, brine shrimp, cyanobacteria, protease inhibition, proteasome, SARS, tuberculosis

Introduction

Cyanobacteria have been shown to be a rich source of biologically active secondary metabolites (Davies-Coleman et al., 2003; Han et al., 2003; Kaya et al., 2002; Nogle & Gerwick, 2003; Williams et al., 2004). Frequently, the cyanobacterial material is collected directly from the field; however, this biomass is often an assemblage of multiple organisms, which casts doubt on the true origin of an isolated natural product (Macmillan & Molinski, 2005; Nogle & Gerwick, 2002). This also makes the recollection and re-isolation of a particular natural product difficult. In addition, field collections heavily favor cyanobacteria that naturally have dense growth.

In contrast, the use of cultured cyanobacteria allows for the investigation of species that may not grow to sufficient density in the wild, as well as the ability to rapidly obtain additional biomass for the re-isolation of natural products of interest. Controlled culture conditions also ensure a greater degree of purity of the biological material since unialgal or even axenic (i.e. lacking epiphytic microorganisms) strains are utilized to produce the needed biomass. Our goal is to establish a culture collection of cyanobacteria that can be utilized in natural product drug discovery efforts. Herein, we present the results of the biological evaluation of material obtained from our collection.

The six biological targets in this study were chosen based on previous reports of biological activities from cyanobacteria. The three protease targets, 20S proteasome and two viral proteases (SARS PLpro and 3CLpro), were selected based on reports of protease inhibitors isolated from cyanobacteria (Ploutno et al., 2002; Yamaki et al., 2005). The importance of the proteasome, as part of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, in regulation of transcription and the cell cycle has made inhibition of the proteasome a key target for the treatment of cancer (Burger & Seth, 2004; Ciechanover, 1994; Ciechanover & Iwai, 2004; Khan et al., 2006; King et al., 1996; Ohta & Fukuda, 2004). Drug discovery efforts targeting this enzyme have led to the development of Bortezomib (Velcade™, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), which was approved by the US FDA in May 2003 for the treatment of multiple myeloma (Burger & Seth, 2004). In addition, salinosporamide A, a proteasome inhibitor obtained from a marine actinomycete, is currently in phase I clinical trials for the treatment of multiple myeloma (Feling et al., 2003).

In addition, we evaluated our collection of cyano-bacterial extracts for the potential to inhibit two viral proteases from the coronavirus (CoV) responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (Liang, 2006). This virus gained public recognition in 2003 during the SARS epidemic that originated in southern China. Two proteases, the papain like protease (PLpro) and the chymotrypsin like protease (3CLpro), have been shown to be important in viral replication, and inhibition of these proteases interrupts the virus’s life cycle and decrease viral loads (Chen et al., 2005; Harcourt et al., 2004).

Cyanobacteria have also been shown to be a source of antimicrobial compounds (Harvey, 2000; Jaki et al., 2000). For this project we selected two current microbial targets, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Bacillus anthracis. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which affects an estimated 1.76 billion people worldwide, is naturally resistant to many antibiotics (Cole et al., 1998; Morens et al., 2004). In addition, the emergence of HIV-TB coinfection, multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) tuberculosis strains only further complicates the treatment of this disease. Thus, novel treatments for TB are needed. Natural products continue to provide useful leads for the development of new antimycobacterial agents (El Sayed et al., 2000; Okunade et al., 2004).

On the other hand, Bacillus anthracis is not a traditional public health concern. During the twentieth century in the USA, there were only 18 reported cases of inhalation anthrax, the most lethal form of anthrax (Quintiliani & Quintiliani, 2003). In 2001, the threat of anthrax garnered increased attention after the terrorist attacks in the USA (Knight, 2001). Naturally occurring resistance and, in particular, engineered resistance in B. anthracis add to the threat to public health and safety. Consequently, there is focus on the search for new treatments for anthrax to reduce the renewed threat of this disease.

In addition to the five assays listed above, the brine shrimp, Artemia salina, assay was utilized to measure toxicity of the extracts (Meyer et al., 1982).

Materials and methods

Collection

Cyanobacterial strain acquisition

Strains of cyanobacteria were obtained from the Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin (UTEX) (Starr & Zeikus, 1993) and the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton (CCMP) (Andersen et al., 1997). In addition, unique strains of cyanobacteria were isolated in our laboratory from collections made in the Great Lakes region of the USA. Unialgal strains were obtained through a combination of algal isolation techniques. The three techniques used in this study were isolation by streak plate, micropipette and serial dilution plate (Andersen & Kawachi, 2005; Hoshaw & Rosowski, 1973). Taxonomic identification was completed via microscopic observation and aided with the taxonomic guides written by Komarek (2003), Komarek et al. (2003), and Komarek and Anagnostidis (2005). For this study, strains from UTEX are designated with a U preceding the strain number, C for CCMP strains, and I for strains isolated by the authors.

Three media were employed for cyanobacterial isolation; Z and modified versions of BG-11 and BG-110, which we have designated BG-12 and BG-120, respectively. The composition of Z medium has been previously described by Falch et al. (1995). The preparation of BG-11 and BG-110 has been described by Andersen et al. (2005). We modified BG-11 and BG110 by substituting citric acid and ferric ammonium citrate with 5.0 mL of a FeEDTA solution per L of media. The FeEDTA solution, also used in the Z medium, was prepared according to Schlösser (1994).

Cultivation

Media

Culture media for freshwater strains were Allen, Z, Z45, and DY-V. These media were selected based upon media previously used in the cultivation of acquired strains. For strains isolated at UIC, Z medium was designated as the preferred media due to a moderate concentration of the major nutrients and a nitrogen:phosphorus ratio most like the Redfield ratio (Wetzel, 2001). Media recipes for Allen and DY-V have been detailed by Andersen et al. (2005). The composition of the Z45 medium has been described by Mian et al. (2003). For the culture of marine strains, ES and f/2 were utilized (Andersen et al., 2005). For all of the media, silica (Na2SiO3) a nutrient needed for the growth of diatoms, was not included, if listed in the protocol. The concentration of the major nutrients in these media is detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Concentration (mM) of major nutrients in media.

Nutrient Allen BG-12 DY-V ES f/2 Z Z45
C (CO3) 0.189 0.189 - - - 0.189   -
N (NO3) 17.6 17.6* 0.235 0.199 0.883 5.74 5.74
N (NH4) - - - 0.060 - 0.002 0.002
P (PO4) 0.215 0.175 0.071 0.022 0.036 0.399 5.74
*

Nutrient absent in BG-120 modification of this medium.

Culture conditions

For each strain, stock cultures were grown using 150 mL of liquid media in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. From the stock cultures, 5–10 mL was used to inoculate 1.0 L of liquid media in a 2.8 L Fernback flask. The 1.0 L culture was cultivated at 20°C under a mean illuminance of 1.93 klx. An automated timer system provided a 24 h light/dark cycle that consisted of 18 h of illumination and 6 h of darkness.

Extraction

The 1.0 L cultures were allowed to grow for 6–8 weeks prior to harvest. The cell material was harvested by centrifugation then freeze-dried. The lyophilized biomass was extracted via maceration with methanol:dichloromethane (1:1). Three rounds of maceration were used to afford the final extract. The resulting extract was dried in vacuo. For each extract, library solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were prepared at concentrations of 4 and 10 mg/mL. These library solutions were stored at −80°C and were used to supply material needed for evaluation in the different assay systems.

Protease bioassays

All extracts were initially evaluated for percentage inhibition at a concentration of 100 µg/mL. Extracts demonstrating inhibition that was 70% or greater were then evaluated in a dose-dependent fashion to determine the IC50 of the extract. The 4 mg/mL extract solutions were utilized as the source of cyanobacterial extracts for the protease assays.

20S Proteasome

The assay was performed according to the protocol provided with the BIOMOL 20S Proteasome Assay Kit for Drug Discovery (BIOMOL International LP, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA catalog number AK740-0001). The protocol was modified such that the 10 min incubation period was performed at 37°C. Enzyme was acquired from BostonBiochem (20S proteasome, human, BostonBiochem, USA catalog number E-360) and substrate from BIOMOL (Suc-LLVY-AMC, catalog number P802-0005). This substrate is specific for the chymotrypsin-like activity of the 20S proteasome. Fluorescence was measured using either a Tecan Genios Pro microplate reader or a Hewlett Packard model AF10000 fluorimeter with an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission wavelength of 460 nm.

SARS-CoV PLpro

SARS-CoV PLpro protein (polyprotein residues 1544–1825) was purified as previously described by Barretto et al. (2005). Inhibition assays were performed in duplicate in black 96-well plates containing the following components: 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50 nM PLpro, 5% DMSO, and 100 µg/mL cyanobacterial extract. The peptidic substrate RLRGG-AMC (Bachem, King of Prussia, PA) was added to a final concentration of 50 µM to initiate the reaction, and product fluorescence was measured using a Tecan Genios Pro microplate reader (excitation wavelength: 360 nm, emission wavelength: 460 nm).

SARS-CoV 3CLpro

SARS-CoV 3CLpro assay was performed in a 96-well microtiter plate as described by Grum-Tokars et al. (2008). Briefly, the assay contained the following components: 50 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and 500 nM 3CLpro, 5% DMSO, and 100 µg/mL cyanobacterial extract. The FRET-based substrate utilized in this assay was 1 µM Alexafluor 488 and the resulting fluoresence was measured using a Tecan Genios Pro microplate reader (excitation wavelength: 490 nm, emission wavelength: 535 nm).

Antimicrobial bioassays

For the antimicrobial assays, extracts displaying minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) values less than or equal to 100 µg/ml were considered active.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Evaluation of cyanobacterial extracts was performed using the microplate alamar blue assay (MABA) as described by Collins and Franzblau (1997). Cyanobacterial extracts were provided for this assay using the 10 mg/mL stock solutions.

Bacillus anthracis

Extracts were evaluated at a range of concentrations from 100 µg/mL to 48.8 ng/mL using a 4 mg/mL stock solution in DMSO. Evaluation of the extracts was performed as previously described by Athamna et al. (2004).

Brine shrimp toxicity assay (Artemia salina)

Evaluation of cyanobacterial extracts was performed at a concentration of 100 µg/mL, using the assay described by Metcalf et al. (2002). Metcalf’s method was modified by omitting the second 24-hour incubation of A. salina cysts and including only one observation after 16–18 hours of incubation of the nauplii in the test solutions.

Results

Culture collection

A collection of 61 strains were cultured and evaluated in the assays described. A complete list of all strains evaluated is given in Table 2. This group of 61 includes members of all five orders of cyanobacteria and represents all six media currently used by the University of Illinois at Chicago culture collection (Table 3). Those strains isolated from field collections during this project are listed in Table 4.

Table 2.

Full list of strains investigated and associated biological activity.

Scientific Name Source1 Medium Assay2
PR3 PL3 CL3 AX4 TB4 BS5
Order Chroococcales
Aphanocapsa sp. I 10009 Z - - - - - -
Aphanothece sp. C 2529 f/2 - - - - - -
Chamaesiphon sp. U 2347 Allen 1.0 - - - - -
Chroococcus sp. C 2128 DY-V 15.4 - - - - -
Enthophysalis cf. sp. C 2136 DY-V - - - - - -
Eucapsis sp. U 1519 Z45 30.0 - - - - -
Gloeocapsa sp. U EE 3 Allen - - - - - -
Synechococcus cf. elongates C 1629 f/2 - - - - - -
Synechocystis nigrescens (nom. prov.
R.A. Lewin)
U 2587 ES - - - - - -
Synechocystis sp. I 10006 Z - - - - - -
Synechocystis sp. I 10010 Z 28.3 - - - - -
Order Pleurocapsales
Dermocarpa violacea Crouan U 1635 ES - - - - -
Pleurocapsa fuliginosa Thuret in
Hauck
U 2555 ES - - - - -
Order Oscillatoriales
Arthrospira fusiformis Vouk U 2720 Allen - - - - - -
Arthrospira platensis (Oerst.) Geitler C 1295 f/2 - - - - - -
Geitlerinema carotinosum (Geitler) C 2534 f/2 - - - - - -
Anagnostidis
Lyngbya aestuarii (Mert.) Liebmann U 2515 ES - - - - - 100 %
Lyngbya aestuarii Gomont C 473 f/2 - - - - - -
Lyngbya lagerheimii (Möb.) Gom. U 2574 Allen - - - - - -
Lyngbya sp. U 2516 ES - - - - - -
Lyngbya sp. C 2520 f/2 - - - - - -
Lyngbya spiralis Geitler U 1831 Z45 - - - - - -
Microcoleus vaginatus var. cyano
Viridis Baker & Bold
U 1815 Z45 68.2 - - - - -
Microcoleus cf. sp. C 1184 1184 - - - - - -
Oscillatoria amoena (Kütz.) Gom. U 1306 Z45 46.3 - - - - -
Oscillatoria brevis (Kütz.) Gom. U 1567 Z45 0.1 - - - - -
Oscillatoria sp. C 1519 f/2 - - - - - -
Oscillatoria tenuis Ag. U 1566 Allen - - - - - -
Phormidium tenue (Agardh ex
Gomont) Anagnostidis & Komarek
C 1231 f/2 - - - - - -
Phormidium autumnale (Ag.) Gom. U 1580 ES - - - - - -
Planktothrix agardhii (Gomont)
Anagnostidis & Komarek
C 600 DY-V - - - - - -
Planktothrix agardhii (Gomont)
Anagnostidis & Komarek
C 601 DY-V - - - - - -
Plectonema boryanum Gom. U 596 Z45 - - - - - -
Plectonema sp. U 1541 Allen - - - - - -
Schizothrix calcicola (Ag.) Gom. U 1817 Allen - - - - - -
Schizothrix calcicola var. radiata U 1819 DY-V - - - - - -
Baker & Bold
Schizothrix calcicola (Ag.) Gom. U 2245 DY-V - - - - - -
Symploca sp. I 10001 Z - - - - - -
Order Nostocales
Anabaena sp. C 2066 DY-V - - - - - -
Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (L.) Ralfs U 2384 Z45 - - - - - -
Calothrix anomala Mitra U 1319 Z45 0.1 - - - - -
Calothrix parietina Thur. U 1952 Z45 5.9 - - - - -
Cylindorspermopsis raciborskii
(Wolosz.)
C 1973 DY-V - - - - - -
Cylindrospermum licheniforme Kütz. U 2014 Allen - - - - - -
Fremyella diplosiphon (Gom.)
Drouet
U 481 Allen - - - - - -
Gloeotrichia ghosi Singh U 1920 Z45 - - - - - -
Gloeotrichia sp. U 583 Z - - - - - -
Nodularia harveyana (Thw.) Thuret U 2093 Z45 - - - - - -
Nodularia spumigena (Mertens in
Juergens) Born.& Flah.
U 2092 Allen - - - - - -
Nostoc commune Vaucher U 1621 Z45 0.3 - - - - -
Nostoc edaphicum Kondrat’eva U 2492 Z45 - - - - - -
Nostoc foliaceum Moug. U 1624 Z45 - - - - - -
Nostoc muscorum Ag. U 2301 Allen - - 10.0 3.1 < 100 -
Nostoc muscorum Ag. U 1933 ES - - - - - -
Scytonema hofmanni Ag. U 1834 Z45 15.1 - - 25 - -
Scytonema sp. U 2588 ES - - - - - -
Spririrestis rafaelensis (Flechtner
nom. nud.)
U 2660 Z45 - - - - - -
Tolypothrix sp. C 1185 DY-V - 80 6.0 100 - -
Tolypothrix sp. C 2147 DY-V 0.2 - - - - 90 %
Order Stigonematales
Fischerella ambigua (Näg.) Gom. U 1903 Allen - - 10.0 6.3 2.7 90 %
Hapalosiphon welwitschii W. & G.S.
West
U 1830 Z45 - - - 50 - -
1

Source abbreviations: C, Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton; U, Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Texas at Austin; I, Isolated by authors at University of Illinois at Chicago.

2

Assay abbreviations: PR, 20S Proteasome; AX, Bacillus anthracis; TB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; PL, SARS-CoV PLpro; CL, SARS-CoV 3CLpro; BS, Brine shrimp.

3

IC50 value reported in µg/ml, minus sign (−) denotes IC50 values greater than 100 µg/ml,values in bold denote significant activity ≤ 10 µg/ml.

4

MIC value reported in µg/ml, minus sign (−) denotes MIC values greater than 100 µg/ml, values in bold denote significant activity ≤ 50 µg/ml.

5

Lethality rate at 100 µg/ml, minus sign (−) denotes lethality ≤10%.

Table 3.

Summary of strains investigated.

Order Freshwater/terrestrial Marine Total
Chroococcales 8 3 11
Pleurocapsales 0 2 2
Oscillatoriales 16 9 25
Nostocales 19 2 21
Stigonematales 2 0 2
Total 45 16 61

Table 4.

Strains isolated by authors.

Strain ID Genus Collection Site
10001 Symploca Forest Ave., Downers Grove, IL
10006 Synechocystis Wood St., Chicago, IL
10009 Aphanocapsa Harbor at Menominee, MI
10010 Synechocystis UIC Field Station, Downers
Grove, IL

Protease inhibition assays

Extracts were considered active when exhibiting inhibition greater than or equal to 70% at 100 µg/mL. For the 20S proteasome assay, it was found that 12 extracts were active. In the SARS-CoV assays, one extract displayed activity in the PLpro assay and three were active in the 3CLpro assay. The only overlap of activity among the protease inhibition assays was the extract of strain Tolypothrix sp. (C 1185), which displayed activity against both SARS proteases.

All active extracts were evaluated to determine the IC50 values (Table 2). The IC50 values obtained for the extracts active against the SARS 3CLpro were at or below 10 µg/mL. Similarly, 6 of the 12 proteasome active extracts displayed significant levels of activity with IC50 values less than 10 µg/mL. However, the extract active in the PLpro assay, Tolypothrix sp. (C 1185), displayed an IC50 of 80 µg/mL in the PLpro assay and the dose response was linear. Due to the linear response displayed, the extract from Tolypothrix sp. (C 1185) was further investigated. It was shown that the majority of the activity could be explained by the shielding of the 4-amino-7-methyl-coumarin (AMC) fluorophore, and not by specific inhibition of the PLpro enzyme. On the other hand, the activity of this extract in the 3CLpro assay was still considered significant since the IC50 value was ten-fold lower, 6.0 µg/mL, and the dose-dependent response could be described by an idealized IC50 dose response curve. In addition, the flourophore used and the excitation and emission wavelength pairs were different for the two SARS-CoV protease assays.

Antimicrobial assays

The active threshold for the antimicrobial assays was defined at an MIC value less than or equal to 100 µg/mL. In the B. anthracis assay, five extracts displayed activity at MIC values ranging from 3.1 to 100 µg/mL. The extracts of two strains, Nostoc muscorum Ag. (U 2301) and Fischerella ambiguia (Näg) Gom. (U 1903), which showed the greatest activity in the anthrax assay (MIC values of 6.3 and 3.1 µg/mL respectively), were the only extracts to display a significant level of activity in the TB assay.

Brine shrimp toxicity assay

Three extracts, F. ambigua (U 1903), Tolypothrix sp. (C 2147), and Lyngbya aestuarii (Mert.) Liebmann (U 2515), displayed significant activity at 100 µg/mL. The toxicity of these extracts was greater than 90% mortality at 100 µg/mL. All other extracts displayed mortality rates less than or equal to 10% at this dose.

Discussion

Our data revealed that several cyanobacterial extracts possess significant levels of activity in two of the three proteases evaluated, SARS-CoV 3CLpro and the 20S proteasome. It should be noted that both 3CLpro and the targeted proteolytic activity of the 20S proteasome are chymotrypsin-like, whereas the PLpro enzyme is a papain-like protease. For these designations, chymotrypsin-like and papain-like, the model proteases are a digestive protease in animals (chymotrypsin) and a plant protease isolated from the papaya fruit (papain). The chymotrypsin-like activity is not limited to digestion in higher animals but, has been reported in arthropods, e.g., Daphnia magna, which often graze on cyanobacteria (von Elert et al., 2004). Based on this information, one could speculate that the disparity of activity between the chymotrypsin-like and papain-like proteases could be due to an adaptation of cyanobacteria to grazing. However, further research is needed to substantiate this theory.

Analysis of the antibacterial results showed a correlation of very strong antianthrax activity and antimyco-bacterial activity. These results would support the idea that M. tuberculosis is more resistant to the antibacterial effects of the extracts than B. anthracis. This idea is also supported by the fact that M. tuberculosis is naturally resistant to many antibiotics due to the presence of several drug efflux systems, a highly hydrophobic cell envelope, and various drug modifying enzymes (Cole et al., 1998). In the case of either target, significant activity was found among the extracts evaluated. Further chemical analysis of the extract from F. ambigua (U 1903) has lead to the isolation of several antibacterial ambiguine isonitriles. Details of the isolation and characterization of these compounds will be presented in a subsequent publication.

Three extracts displayed significant activity in the brine shrimp toxicity assay, with only one extract, Lyngbya aestuarii (U 2515), not displaying activity against any other targets evaluated. In addition, this was the only extract from marine cyanobacteria to display significant activity in any of our assay systems.

In total, extracts of 12 different strains possessed significant levels of activity in one or more targets. When the data were grouped by taxonomic order, the highest density of significant active extracts was found among the orders Nostocales and Stigonematales (9 out of 12). These orders, combined, constitute all of the hetero-cyst-forming cyanobacteria. This cohort was the only group to have representative extracts, which showed significant activity in both the antimicrobial and SARS protease bioassays. Whereas extracts displaying activity in the 20S proteasome and brine shrimp assay were not limited to the cohort of heterocystic cyanobacteria. Further analysis of the data, when organized by growth medium, showed the cyanobacteria cultivated in freshwater conditions exhibited the most significant activity (11 out of 12). These results further support the use of cyanobacteria, in particular freshwater, heterocystic strains, in drug discovery efforts for antiviral, anticancer, and antibiotic lead compounds.

Acknowledgements

We thank Kiira Ratia, Dr. Valerie Grum-Tokars, Molly Bishop, and Sara Forrester of the Center for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy UIC College of Pharmacy) for performing the PLpro (K.R.), 3CLpro (V.G-T.), and B. anthracis assays (M.B. and S.R.). We also thank Baojie Wan of the Institute for Tuberculosis Research (UIC College of Pharmacy) for performing the TB assays.

This work was supported by NIH Grant 1 R01 GM075856 and the University of Illinois at Chicago Spring 2006 Provost Award to G.C.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest:

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Andersen RA, Berges JA, Harrison PJ, Watanabe MM. Recipes for freshwater and seawater media. In: Andersen RA, editor. Algal Culturing Techniques. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. pp. 429–538. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen RA, Kawachi M. Traditional microalgae isolation techniques. In: Andersen RA, editor. Algal Culturing Techniques. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. pp. 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen RA, Morton SL, Sexton JP. Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton 1997 list of strains. J Phycol. 1997;33:S1–S75. [Google Scholar]
  4. Athamna A, Athamna M, Abu-Rashed N, Medlej B, Bast DJ, Rubinstein E. Selection of Bacillus anthracis isolates resistant to antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54:424–428. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barretto N, Jukneliene D, Ratia K, Chen Z, Mesecar AD, Baker SC. The papain-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus has deubiquitinating activity. J Virol. 2005;79:15189–15198. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.24.15189-15198.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burger AM, Seth AK. The ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation pathway in cancer: Therapeutic implications. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:2217–2229. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen L, Gui C, Luo X, Yang Q, Gunther S, Scandella E, Drosten C, Bai D, He X, Ludewig B, Chen J, Luo H, Yang Y, Yang Y, Zou J, Thiel V, Chen K, Shen J, Shen X, Jiang H. Cinanserin is an inhibitor of the 3C-like proteinase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and strongly reduces virus replication in vitro. J Virol. 2005;79:7095–7103. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.11.7095-7103.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. Cell. 1994;79:13–21. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90396-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ciechanover A, Iwai K. The Ubiquitin system: From basic mechanisms to the patient bed. IUBMB Life. 2004;56:193–201. doi: 10.1080/1521654042000223616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry CE, Tekaia F, Badcock K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies R, Devlin K, Feltwell T, Gentles S. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;393:537–544. doi: 10.1038/31159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins L, Franzblau SG. Microplate Alamar blue assay versus BACTEC 460 system for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 1997;41:1004–1009. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.5.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies-Coleman MT, Dzeha TM, Gray CA, Hess S, Pannell LK, Hendricks DT, Arendse CE. Isolation of homodolastatin 16, a new cyclic depsipeptide from a Kenyan collection of Lyngbya majuscula. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:712–715. doi: 10.1021/np030014t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. El Sayed KA, Bartyzel P, Shen XY, Perry TL, Kjawiony JK, Hamann MT. Marine natural products as antituberculosis agents. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:949–953. [Google Scholar]
  14. Falch BS, Konig GM, Wright AD, Sticher O, Angerhofer CK, Pezzuto JM, Bachmann H. Biological-activities of cyanobacteria - Evaluation of extracts and pure compounds. Planta Med. 1995;61:321–328. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feling RH, Buchanan GO, Mincer TJ, Kauffman CA, Jensen PR, Fenical W. Salinosporamide A: a highly cytotoxic proteasome inhibitor from a novel microbial source, a marine bacterium of the new genus Salinospora. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:355–357. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grum-Tokars V, Ratia K, Begaye A, Baker SC, Mesecar AD. Evaluating the 3C–like protease activity of SARS-Coronavirus: Recommendations for standardized assays for drug discovery. Virus Res. 2008;133:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Han B, McPhail KL, Ligresti A, Di Marzo V, Gerwick WH. Semiplenamides A–G, fatty acid amides from a Papua New Guinea collection of the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya semiplena. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:1364–1368. doi: 10.1021/np030242n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harcourt BH, Jukneliene D, Kanjanahaluethai A, Bechill J, Severson KM, Smith CM, Rota PA, Baker SC. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replicase products and characterization of papain-like protease activity. J Virol. 2004;78:13600–13612. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13600-13612.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Harvey A. Strategies for discovering drugs from previously unexplored natural products. Drug Discov Today. 2000;5:294–300. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(00)01511-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoshaw RW, Rosowski JR. Methods for microscopic algae. In: Stein JR, editor. Handbook of Phycological Methods: Culture Methods & Growth Measurements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973. pp. 53–68. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jaki B, Orjala J, Heilmann J, Linden A, Vogler B, Sticher O. Novel extracellular diterpenoids with biological activity from the cyanobacterium Nostoc commune. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:339–343. doi: 10.1021/np9903090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaya K, Mahakhant A, Keovara L, Sano T, Kubo T, Takagi H. Spiroidesin, a novel lipopeptide from the cyanobacterium Anabaena spiroides that inhibits cell growth of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:920–921. doi: 10.1021/np010660x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Khan T, Stauffer JK, Williams R, Hixon JA, Salcedo R, Lincoln E, Back TC, Powell D, Lockett S, Arnold AC, Sayers TJ, Wigginton JM. Proteasome inhibition to maximize the apoptotic potential of cytokine therapy for murine neuroblastoma tumors. J Immunol. 2006;176:6302–6312. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. King RW, Deshaies RJ, Peters JM, Kirschner MW. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science. 1996;274:1652–1659. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Knight J. Delivering death in the mail. Nature. 2001;414:837–838. doi: 10.1038/414837a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Komárek J, Anagnostidis K. Cyanoprokaryota 2.Teil: Oscillatoriales. München: Elsevier GmbH; 2005. p. 759. [Google Scholar]
  27. Komárek J, Komárková J, Kling H. Filamentous cyanobacteria. In: Wehr JD, Sheath RG, editors. Freshwater Algae of North America. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2003. pp. 117–196. [Google Scholar]
  28. Komárek J. Coccoid and colonial cyanobacteria. In: Wehr JD, Sheath RG, editors. Freshwater Algae of North America. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2003. pp. 59–116. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liang PH. Characterization and inhibition of SARS-coronavirus main protease. Curr Top Med Chem. 2006;6:361–376. doi: 10.2174/156802606776287090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Macmillan JB, Molinski TF. Majusculoic acid, a brominated cyclopropyl fatty acid from a marine cyanobacterial mat assemblage. J Nat Prod. 2005;68:604–606. doi: 10.1021/np049596k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Metcalf JS, Lindsay J, Beattie KA, Birmingham S, Saker ML, Torokne AK, Codd GA. Toxicity of cylindrospermopsin to the brine shrimp Artemia salina: Comparisons with protein synthesis inhibitors and microcystins. Toxicon. 2002;40:1115–1120. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(02)00105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meyer BN, Ferrigni NR, Putnam JE, Jacobsen LB, Nichols DE, McLaughlin JL. Brine shrimp: A convenient general bio-assay for active plant constituents. Planta Med. 1982;45:31–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mian P, Heilmann J, Burgi HR, Sticher O. Biological screening of terrestrial and freshwater cyanobacteria for antimicrobial activity, brine shrimp lethality, and cytotoxicity. Pharm Biol. 2003;4:243–247. [Google Scholar]
  34. Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2004;430:242–249. doi: 10.1038/nature02759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nogle LM, Gerwick WH. Somocystinamide A, a novel cytotoxic disulfide dimer from a Fijian marine cyanobacterial mixed assemblage. Org Lett. 2002;4:1095–1098. doi: 10.1021/ol017275j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nogle LM, Gerwick WH. Diverse secondary metabolites from a Puerto Rican collection of Lyngbya majuscula. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:217–220. doi: 10.1021/np020332c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ohta T, Fukuda M. Ubiquitin and breast cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:2079–2088. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Okunade AL, Elvin-Lewis MP, Lewis WH. Natural antimy-cobacterial metabolites: Current status. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:1017–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ploutno A, Shoshan M, Carmeli S. Three novel protease inhibitors from a natural bloom of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:973–978. doi: 10.1021/np010597b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Quintiliani R, Jr, Quintiliani R. Inhalational anthrax and bioterrorism. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003;9:221–226. doi: 10.1097/00063198-200305000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schlösser UG. SAG - Sammlung von Algenjulturen at The University of Göttingen. Catalogue of strains 1994. Bot Acta. 1994;107:113–186. [Google Scholar]
  42. Starr RC, Zeikus JA. UTEX - the Culture Collection of Algae at the University-Of-Texas at Austin 1993 List of Cultures. J Phycol. 1993;29:1–106. [Google Scholar]
  43. von Elert E, Agrawal MK, Gebauer C, Jaensch H, Bauer U, Zitt A. Protease activity in gut Daphnia magna: Evidence for trypsin and chymotrypsin enzymes. Comp Biochem Phys B Comp Biochem Phys B. 2004;137:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2003.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wetzel RG. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2001. The phosphorus cycle; pp. 239–288. [Google Scholar]
  45. Williams PG, Yoshida WY, Moore RE, Paul VJ. Micromide and guamamide: Cytotoxic alkaloids from a species of the marine cyanobacterium Symploca. J Nat Prod. 2004;67:49–53. doi: 10.1021/np030215x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yamaki H, Sitachitta N, Sano T, Kaya K. Two new chymotrypsin inhibitors isolated from the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-88. J Nat Prod. 2005;68:14–18. doi: 10.1021/np0401361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES