. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 21.

Published in final edited form as: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Apr;123(4):2295–2309. doi: 10.1121/1.2831738

TABLE IV.

Comparison of the performance in percent correct between the baseline condition (M₁₂N₁₂) and the extended frequency range condition (M₁₄N₁₂) for all four SNRs. The p values were found by one-way RM ANOVAs.

CI SNR (dB)	M₁₂N₁₂		M₁₄N₁₂
CI SNR (dB)	Average	Stand. Dev.	Average	Stand. Dev.	Difference	p
Quiet	90.57	8.79	79.29	13.50	−11.29	0.002
+10	87.86	9.19	72.14	15.14	−15.71	0.004
+5	76.86	15.94	61.86	22.14	−15.00	0.064
0	56.86	16.22	36.43	26.44	−20.43	0.054
NH SNR (dB)	M₁₂N₁₂		M₁₄N₁₂
NH SNR (dB)	Average	Stand. Dev.	Average	Stand. Dev.	Difference	p

Quiet	98.50	1.76	98.67	1.03	0.17	0.72
+10	98.00	1.55	97.83	1.17	−0.17	0.41
+5	96.67	3.01	95.17	4.45	−1.50	0.43
0	85.33	4.08	88.33	3.98	3.00	0.19