Skip to main content
. 2001 Mar 13;98(6):3115–3120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051631098

Table 1.

Statistics of the crystallographic analysis

MAD analysis (Beamline X25) Resolution, Å Reflections (measured/unique) Completeness, % (overall/outer shell) Rsym, % (overall/outer shell) Phasing power (acentric/centric)
Structure determination
 λ1 (0.97953 Å) 50.0–1.94 40,406/4,782 99.9/100.0 5.3/5.8 —/—
 λ2 (0.97935 Å) 50.0–1.94 40,457/4,787 99.9/100.0 5.1/5.4 1.24/0.97
 λ3 (0.97780 Å) 50.0–1.94 40,948/4,791 99.9/100.0 4.5/5.0 1.29/1.06
 λ4 (0.98089 Å) 50.0–1.94 40,558/4,793 99.9/100.0 4.2/4.6 1.03/1.06
 Overall MAD figure of merit (acentric/centric) 0.8048/0.7193
Refinement statistics for native data (Beamline ID-19)
 Resolution, Å 20.0–1.02
Rsym 5.9
 Completeness, % 99.0
R factor (F0 > 4σ/all data) 0.114/0.126
 Free R factor (F0 > 4σ/all data) 0.134/0.145
 rmsd
  Bond length, Å 0.007
  Angle distance, Å 0.025

Rsym = ∑|I − 〈I〉|∑I, where I is observed intensity, 〈I〉 is average intensity obtained from multiple observations of symmetry-related reflections. Pairs of Friedel-related reflections of all datasets treated as two different reflections until refinement rms bond lengths and rms bond angles are the respective rms deviations (rmsd) from ideal values. Free R factor was calculated with 5% of the data omitted from the structure refinement.