Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 7;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-9

Table 4.

Association of six variants on 9p21.3: MI study subpopulation with a positive family history vs. MI study subpopulation with a negative family history

Variant Negative Family History n = 404 Risk Allele Frequency Positive Family History n = 361 Risk Allele Frequency P value OR (95% CI)
rs1333040
C/C T/T T: 0.53 C/C T/T T: 0.57 0.102 1.426(0.932-2.180)
81 107 60 113
rs10757274
A/A G/G G: 0.48 A/A G/G G: 0.56 0.002 1.940(1.269-2.964)
96 83 65 109
rs2383206
A/A G/G G: 0.51 A/A G/G G: 0.57 0.015 1.703(1.108-2.618)
81 89 62 116
rs2383207
A/A G/G G: 0.51 A/A G/G G: 0.58 0.016 1.696(1.103-2.608)
80 89 62 117
rs10757278
A/A G/G G: 0.47 A/A G/G G: 0.55 0.003 1.923(1.256-2.944)
96 79 67 106
rs1333049
G/G C/C C: 0.48 G/G C/C C: 0.55 0.003 1.896(1.241-2.898)
98 81 67 105

Genotype distribution and allelic frequencies of the investigated SNPs on 9p21.3 of the study subpopulation with a positive family history were compared with the study subpopulation with a negative family history. P values and Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for the high-risk homozygous alleles.