Table II.
All participantsa |
Only participants who completed high schoolb |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dichotomous Outcomes | Model step | B | Exp (B) | Wald | Δ–2LL | Model step | B | Exp (B) | Wald | Δ–2LL |
Left Home | 1. Group | −1.26 | .28 | 7.94 | 8.57** | 1. Group | −.66 | .52 | 1.91 | 1.95 |
2. Teacher BRIEF | −1.47 | .23 | 5.94 | 7.22** | 2. Teacher BRIEF | −1.56 | .21 | 6.47 | 8.03** | |
3. Group × Teacher BRIEF | 2.99 | .70 | 4.75 | 5.40* | ||||||
Attend College | 1. SES | .12 | 1.12 | 21.16 | 28.35** | 1. SES | .13 | 1.14 | 17.96 | 25.61** |
2. Group | −1.13 | .32 | 5.17 | 5.34* | 2. PPVT-R | .06 | 3.46 | 13.78 | 8.59** | |
3. CAS Planning | .06 | 1.06 | 9.72 | 11.96** | ||||||
4. Group × SES | −.15 | .86 | 4.99 | 5.77* | ||||||
Currently Employed | 1. Intrinsic Motivation | .98 | 2.68 | 5.99 | 6.52* | No significant predictors | ||||
Ever had Romantic | 1. Group | −1.44 | .24 | 7.20 | 7.95** | 1. Group | −1.24 | .29 | 4.39 | 4.51* |
Relationship | 2. Mother BRIEF | −1.44 | .24 | 5.22 | 5.56* | 2. Mother BRIEF | −1.76 | .17 | 5.53 | 6.11* |
Experience | 3. Mother Intrusiveness | −.33 | .72 | 8.98 | 10.23** | 3. Mother Intrusiveness | −.33 | .72 | 5.88 | 6.72** |
Currently in | No significant predictors | No significant predictors | ||||||||
Romantic | ||||||||||
Relationship |
Continuous Outcome | Model step | B | SE B | Β | ΔR2 | Model step | B | SE B | Β | ΔR2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Number of | 1. SES | .01 | .01 | .16 | .02 | 1. Mother BRIEF | −.44 | .13 | −.35 | .12** |
Close Friends | 2. Group | −.03 | .11 | −.03 | .00 | |||||
Item | 3. Mother BRIEF | −.33 | .12 | −.27 | .07** | |||||
4. Group × SES | .03 | .01 | .36 | .07** |
Note. an = 98–102.
bn = 73–86 due to missing data.
*p < .05; **p < .01.