Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 19;55(4):1577–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.038

Table 2.

Correlation coefficients between FA profile for various fiber tracts in registered subjects and the atlas for the eight registration algorithms. Results significantly different from the best performance algorithm are marked with * (p<5%) and ** (p<1%).

Fiber Tracts Affine B-spline FSL Demons Demon s-log Fluid DTI-TK MedINRI A Best Performance
GENU MEAN 0.5082 0.9057 0.9506 0.9039 0.9227 0.926 0.9487 0.9369 FSL
STDEV 0.2851 0.0691 0.0325 0.0955 0.0429 0.068 0.0315 0.0296
p-value 0.0007** 0.0721 0.2017 0.1262 0.2644 0.8362 0.2822
Rank 8 6 1 7 5 4 2 3

SPLENIUM MEAN 0.6431 0.8594 0.8868 0.8173 0.8386 0.8648 0.8927 0.8368 DTI-TK
STDEV 0.2884 0.0709 0.0629 0.064 0.0559 0.0952 0.0479 0.074
p-value 0.0200* 0.1042 0.7485 0.0013 0.0114 0.2037 0.0585
Rank 8 4 2 7 5 3 1 6

LEFT HEMISPHERE INTERNAL CAPSULE MEAN 0.5712 0.8445 0.9453 0.9617 0.9693 0.9578 0.9499 0.9318 Demons-log
STDEV 0.0947 0.1456 0.0223 0.0145 0.0104 0.0106 0.0118 0.0272
p-value <0.0001** 0.0233 0.0172 0.0546 0.0048 0.0052 0.0015
Rank 8 7 5 2 1 3 4 6

LEFT HEMISPHERE UNCINATE MEAN 0.5568 0.8546 0.9146 0.8923 0.8988 0.7282 0.8995 0.8625 FSL
STDEV 0.133 0.051 0.0292 0.0808 0.0993 0.0838 0.0318 0.058
p-value <0.0001** 0.0018** 0.7439 0.9765 0.0001** 0.195 0.0046**
Rank 8 6 1 4 3 7 2 5