Table 4.
The proportion of the Direct Effect (DE) of AA attendance (0-3m) on subsequent alcohol use outcomes (13-15m) accounted for by each hypothesized social network mechanism (4-9m) controlling for baseline covariates
| Z Mack | p | % of DE mediated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP (PDA) | Pro-abstinent network | 3.72 | <.01 | 16% |
| Pro-drinking network | 2.78 | <.02 | 13% | |
| Abstinent activities | - | - | - | |
| Drinking activities | - | - | - | |
| AC (PDA) | Pro-abstinent network | 2.25 | <.03 | 7% |
| Pro-drinking network | 3.10 | <.01 | 13% | |
| Abstinent activities | - | - | - | |
| Drinking activities | - | - | - | |
| OP (DDD) | Pro-abstinent network | - | - | - |
| Pro-drinking network | -2.71 | <.02 | 14% | |
| Abstinent Activities | - | - | - | |
| Drinking Activities | - | - | - | |
| AC (DDD) | Pro-abstinent network | - | - | - |
| Pro-drinking network | -2.72 | <.02 | 12% | |
| Abstinent Activities | - | - | - | |
| Drinking Activities | - | - | - |
PDA=Percent Days Abstinent; DDD=Drinks per Drinking Day; OP=Outpatient; AC=Aftercare.