Table 3.

Adjusted Hazard Ratio for the Risk of Any CHD Event in Adulthood in Relation to a 1-Unit Increase in BMI z Score in Models Unadjusted and Adjusted for Birth Weight in a Cohort of 208,433 Children.^*

Age	Boys		Girls
	Model Unadjusted for Birth Weight	Model Adjusted for Birth Weight	Model Unadjusted for Birth Weight	Model Adjusted for Birth Weight
	relative risk (95% confidence interval)†
7 yr	1.09 (1.05−1.12)	1.10 (1.07−1.14)	1.04 (1.00−1.09)	1.05 (1.00−1.10)
8 yr	1.11 (1.08−1.15)	1.13 (1.10−1.17)	1.05 (1.00−1.10)	1.06 (1.01−1.11)
9 yr	1.13 (1.10−1.17)	1.15 (1.12−1.19)	1.06 (1.01−1.11)	1.07 (1.02−1.12)
10 yr	1.15 (1.11−1.18)	1.16 (1.13−1.20)	1.09 (1.04−1.15)	1.10 (1.05−1.15)
11 yr	1.17 (1.14−1.20)	1.19 (1.15−1.22)	1.11 (1.06−1.17)	1.12 (1.07−1.17)
12 yr	1.20 (1.16−1.23)	1.21 (1.18−1.25)	1.13 (1.08−1.19)	1.14 (1.09−1.19)
13 yr	1.20 (1.17−1.24)	1.22 (1.19−1.26)	1.15 (1.10−1.20)	1.15 (1.10−1.21)

^*Analyses were stratified according to birth cohort. Birth weight is modeled as a cubic spline with five knots. Birth weight was recorded from 1943 and was available for 208,433 of the boys and girls.

^†Trend tests led to the rejection of the alternative of nonlinearity modeled as a restricted cubic spline with five knots (all P values >0.15).