Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: Criminology. 2010 Nov 28;48(4):1101–1131. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00213.x

Table 5. Unstandardized Coefficients from Within-Individual Regressions of Heavy Alcohol Use on Teenage Work Hours and Preferences and Mediating Variables.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Work Hours and Preferences 1
 Not working (prefer no work) .440 * .160 .089 .058
(.182) (.225) (.233) (.253)
 Not working (prefer intensive hours) .320 ** .146 .068 -.025
(.093) (.120) (.123) (.128)
 Moderate work hours .418 *** .218 * .198 .173
(.084) (.110) (.113) (.117)
 Intensive work hours .687 *** .432 ** .316 * .218
(.106) (.138) (.142) (.149)
Time-Varying Explanatory and Control Variables
 Risk-taking .350 *** .308 *** .248 ***
(.055) (.057) (.062)
 Commitment -.087 -.065
(.065) (.068)
 Attachment -.320 *** -.308 ***
(.058) (.062)
 Unstructured Socializing .688 ***
(.061)
Variance Component
 Intercept .858 .778 .770 .624
Estimates of within-individual relationships no yes yes yes

Note.

1

Reference category are non-workers who prefer moderate work; Numbers in parentheses are standard errors;

***

p < .001,

**

p < .01,

*

p < .05; Sample size=3,517 (6,831 occasions)