Table 3.
Significant Effects of Trajectories on Drinking Outcomes
| Descriptive statistics by drinking trajectory | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome, mean(SD) | Significant effect | T1: Frequent (N=196) |
T2: Very frequent (N=259) |
T3: Nearly daily (N=219) |
T4: Daily (N=354) |
T5: Daily stopping early (N=198) |
| Percent days abstinent+++ | Main effect of trajectory+++ | 87.4(16.6) | 80.8(22.3)* | 70.3(28.9)*** | 64.4(34.0)** | 84.8(22.9) |
| Percent heavy drinking days+++ | Main effect of trajectory+++ | 9.6(13.9) | 13.2(19.1) | 17.9(23.9)*** | 19.6(27.6)** | 10.4(19.4) |
| Good clinical outcome, n(%)++ | Main effect of trajectory++ | 129 (80.1%) | 149 (71.6%) | 115 (65.7%)** | 190 (64.6%)** | 126 (75.5%) |
| Interaction between trajectory and acamprosate+ |
Active acamprosate |
Active acamprosate |
Active acamprosate |
Active acamprosate |
Active acamprosate |
|
| 67 (83.8%) | 75 (68.8%)* | 61 (71.8%)* | 99 (67.8%)** | 58 (69.9%)* | ||
| Placebo acamprosate |
Placebo acamprosate |
Placebo acamprosate |
Placebo acamprosate |
Placebo acamprosate |
||
| 62 (76.5%) | 74 (74.8%) | 54 (60.0%)* | 91 (61.5%) | 68 (81.0%) | ||
|
Abstinence from heavy drinking in last two months |
Main effect of trajectory+ |
81 (45.0%) | 101 (41.1%) | 83 (40.5%) | 138 (41.4%) | 104 (55.9%)* |
| Interaction between trajectory and acamprosate+ |
Acamprosate | Acamprosate | Acamprosate | Acamprosate | Acamprosate | |
| 41 (46.6%) | 60 (47.6%) | 46 (45.5%) | 72 (43.9%) | 44 (48.4%) | ||
| Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | ||
| 40 (43.5%) | 41 (34.2%) | 37 (35.6%) | 66 (39.1%) | 60 (63.2%)** | ||
|
Continuous abstinence, n(%) |
Main effect of trajectory+++ |
36 (20.0%) | 56 (22.8%) | 30 (14.7%) | 59 (17.9%) | 65 (35.0%)** |
| Interaction between trajectory and naltrexone+ |
Naltrexone | Naltrexone | Naltrexone | Naltrexone | Naltrexone | |
| 15 (17.1%) | 36 (27.9%) | 13 (11.7%) | 33 (22.3%) | 35 (36.5%)** | ||
| Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | ||
| 21 (22.8%) | 20 (17.1%) | 17 (18.3%) | 26 (14.3%) | 30 (33.3%) | ||
NOTE: Significant overall test of differences among the five trajectories is denoted by the following superscripts next to the variable name:
<.05;
<.01;
<.001. Significant comparisons to T1 are denoted by superscript s next to the number for the corresponding trajectory:
<.05;
<.01;
<.001.
All other interactions involving baseline trajectories were not significant.